this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
898 points (95.1% liked)

Memes

45704 readers
1245 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sem@lemmy.ml 132 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure that lemmy users are different in this from user of Reddit/HackerNews/Facebook/etc.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's never been about reading the post/ articles. Mmm?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I 100% did this on Reddit. And I do it here too. Most news websites are garbage and loaded with advertisements. Get halfway through the story and a full page ad pops up or a video starts playing. Honestly, does anybody stop reading to watch those videos???

Or, you go into the comments and see the summary, or the full article, or quotes of the most important parts with discussions. If I feel I have questions, only then will I open the website.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] li10@lemmy.ml 114 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I read the TLDR bot at least…

Seems like that gives 90% of the relevant info, then I view the article if there’s anything missing.

Not that it makes a difference, my opinions are formed before I even read the title. I’m dug in, and I’ll never change 😎

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 62 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I always read the top comment first, because often they have a better article or explain why the article is misleading

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 24 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I go top comment(s) to see if the article is not clickbait. Then I'll read the summary to see if it's any good. Then I'll go to the article itself if those check out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Magrath@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

I generally do this because the articles are often behind paywalls.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 50 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I prefer to only read the top line of a meme then post. And no that's not a Lemmy user, that's squidward

[–] neo@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago

Right!? Everyone but us is so stupid for talking about Lemmy (who ever that is) in here, while this is obviously squidward. Sheeple are so stupid!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 46 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to read the thing. I want to discuss the thing that i didn't read with other people who didn't read the thing.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 18 points 10 months ago

Did you read the thing? Because I didn't and I don't like your opinion on that topic!

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Many articles are only accessible via a VPN, blocked either by my side or theirs. I'm too tired to switch it on and off. Summary bot is very helpful.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yep, 95% of the news site are cancer

[–] hexortor@lemmy.zip 33 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  1. modern websites are a pain to navigate with popups, paywall, ads, heavy tracking that slows down navigation, autoplaying video ads etc

  2. modern journalism = let's just report whatever the person or company says without fact checking, contextualizing or taking a stance. I believe this is done because it takes less effort and because it makes sure that the news org doesn't anger any of the persons/organizations it has tides with (for ads or direct funding)

The comments solve both problems, as lemmy is ad- and tracking-free and the people in the comments are mostly real people usually without any vested interests in the things they're discussing.

So OBVIOUSLY I only read the comments. I'll get the content of the article indirectly as it's being discussed.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 14 points 10 months ago

Also you can use the comments to determine if the article is even worth reading so you don't accidentally give a click to some hack journalism.

[–] silverdraco@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

This is absolutely true. I get more information and understanding from the discussion in the comments than I do the article. Using other platforms I want to read what people are discussing about the article than the article itself. Brings more depth to the conversation and the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SteefLem@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I read comments first mostly because a lot of posted articles are behind a paywall or i have to turn off my adblockers and maybe someone posted a tldr

[–] PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Shoot, they won't just be posting a tl;dr, but a commentary on it, and sometimes really good context from their field or experience. It's basically the article, but written by a more intelligent journalist who is a part of whatever is being reported on, not just observing from interviews and phone calls (and lame corporate website 'about us' pages).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prunerye@slrpnk.net 22 points 10 months ago

Give me an archive link and I'll click it every time. Otherwise, almost never.

[–] F4rtEmp3r0r@lemmy.ca 21 points 10 months ago

I thought it was standard operating procedure on the Internet.

[–] pastaPersona@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Kinda understandable for articles from sites that pester you to disable adblocker or pay for a subscription (WSJ/Wired/Guardian type news sites etc).

[–] Life_inst_bad@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, we've got the very useful tldr. bot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I tried to read the article but it was paywalled. Or it wanted me to turn off my ad blocker before I could read the article. Or it was a video. Or the source was something like www.patriotusaeaglenews.ru.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Why would I read a long, padded, ad-riddled article when I can get a quick and accurate TL;DR in the title and expert commentary in the comments?

[–] june@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

This is literally the entire internet.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I'll do it again!

[–] carnimoss@lemmings.world 12 points 10 months ago

Yeah guilty as charged

[–] vsis@feddit.cl 12 points 10 months ago

If it's paywalled, yes. I'm just reading the title.

[–] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

So, what's the meme about?

[–] tacofox@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] joucker29@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

I won't waste my time reading your comment, but i'll waste a lot of time talking shit about how i think you commented!

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

Maybe give us a not paywalled link next time?

[–] KrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nl 9 points 10 months ago

Not necessarily a bad thing though.

Think of it this way: There's value in having access to a list of curated content others have deemed "worth reading or looking at". But there is just as much value in engaging in some banter, provided it doesn't lead to outright war in the comments.

I admit, it is tiresome trying to seriously discuss a topic when people haven't actually read the article, but there is still an upside to a topic triggering at least enough interest to where people actually want to engage.

[–] TengoHipo@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

I want peoples opinions on what they read. I ain’t got time lol

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

I feel personally attacked

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

YUP. So make sure your title is good.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 months ago

I wanna report this post because i see myself in the picture.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Everywhere on social media. However, I did notice I actually read through the articles more often here on lemmy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

[insert question directly answered by article here]

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Always have. On /. 25 years ago we posted before reading TFA, it's the way.

load more comments
view more: next ›