this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
265 points (92.3% liked)

Games

16785 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is what an open-world pokemon game should have been. Not the buggy disappointing mess GameFreak gave us for 2 generations.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blazera@kbin.social 49 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Its a very messy game. I dont think there was ever a vision for what kind of game this was going to be, they just grabbed whatever was hype at the time and added it in. Throw in pokemon, throw in fortnite, throw in breath of the wild, throw in meme postable character creator. I guess its working out for em.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 66 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The core gameplay is fun as hell. I'm using a crossbow and my flame fox thing to catch or knock out pals while riding my pink sheep-llama thing to explore the world and having a blast. For an early access game it also runs great and so far no game breaking bugs.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Is the map big enough for 4 people? Friends have been wanting to get it and have me run a dedicated server, but I'm worried we're going to get a few hours into it and get bored from the lack of size and shit to do. Medieval dynasty pulled that on us...

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There's more than enough map. It's huge.

And it will take a lot of hours to even see all the Pals, much less catch them all.

And they aren't just reskins of each other. So far every pal fight feels different. It's a unique experience every time you find a new one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Oh yeah, map is pretty sizable

[–] cooljacob204@kbin.social 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm currently playing it and I don't really think it's as messy as it appears on the surface. It has a pretty clear progression goals from what I can tell 5 hours in.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I agreed I expected a mess but actually got a very good, well thought out game. They definitely got a lot of their ideas from other games but I don't think that's a bad thing when they take all these separate ideas and mix them in a novel way.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

throw in meme postable character creator

Mmm. Monster Factory worthy? Always excited for new episodes of that.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 months ago

You can give sheep guns, Im sure they will eat this game up

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago

Saw that the game was made by the folks that are behind Craftopia, which definitely explains why it looks and plays the way it does, "without a vision". Here's to hoping this one actually gets finished and released.

[–] WalkableProgrammer@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago (7 children)
[–] Phunter@lemm.ee 51 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I agree with most casual reviews that it's a bit unpolished, somewhat buggy, and needs work in some areas, but on the whole is a decent foundation for a game and most importantly is FUN.

[–] r_thndr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fun fun or Dorf Fortress FUN?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Same question.

People rave so hard about any pokemon clone regardless of quality that it's really hard to figure out which ones are actually fun.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 23 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I think this is more of an Ark/MC clone than a Pokemon clone.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm familiar with Ark but MC?

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Oh, duh. It was so obvious I missed it. Thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lickmysword@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Having tried it, there seems to be a lot of thought put into it from having the pals help grow crops to being a flamethrower in battle.

It's very much a smoother Pixelmon experience (pokemon Minecraft mod).

Feels like ark but possibly more polished? Hard to say since it's in early access.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As someone who's played my fair share of Ark, I'd definitely say it's more polished than Ark already

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Easily. My computer runs it on default graphics at 60fps without weird artifacts. The things I use and build work.

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Running a dedicated server for my friend group, and it's pretty fun!

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I've been hearing really good things. People expecting some shit post of a game but ending up with something that was actually pretty deep.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's going to be difficult to answer because people are going to look for different things in the game. I don't particularly care for the survival mechanic. I don't like having to keep up with food. And the food appears to spoil rather quickly. Like some of it has a timer of like 15 minutes. Currently there's a bug though where you can make it last indefinitely. If you have food on you drop it and pick it up and it resets the timer. If you have food in the feed bin, move it from the bin to you then back in a resets the timer. Also appears that perhaps if the pals add food in like eggs it resets the timer as well.

For a pokémon game it's all right. It is leagues better than what the pokémon company has been putting out. Closest I can say is it's kind of similar to Arceus.

The AI needs work yet. But it's early access so that's to be expected.

Combat, I really don't know what to say. You have stats as the player that go up based on your choice each time you level. You can increase your damage by 2 each level... You start at 100 damage... And the weapons that you get are basic, poison and fire. You can also get a melee weapon but... If the player is meant to fight alongside the pal it needs a little work yet. Especially with your range attacks you need to constantly craft ammo.

The whole crafting mechanic... I don't really understand the point. It's the exact same mechanic that's just lobbed into every single game. I will say it works quite well in this mechanically. Like when you're trying to put a wall up or floorboards down they snap together. And you don't need to keep the resources on you you can just have them in a container literally anywhere on your base.

There are proper bad guys, which the pokémon company has long since abandoned.

If this game gets the proper support from the developers, I can definitely see a lot of potential from this. But I think they're definitely going to have to sit down and think about what should be in the game and what should not be in the game.

[–] Jaeger@yiffit.net 2 points 10 months ago

With the food timers, as far as I can tell only the top unit expires, so you can jam 100 baked berries in your feed bag and not have to worry about managing hunger for a few hours

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Its alright if you like the whole survival thing but it isn’t anything groundbreaking, just that plus a Pokémon-esque companion gimmick.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 30 points 10 months ago

Well someone gave it this glowing review:

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How did I not hear about this? I need names, now.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

Palworld.

For an early access it's surprisingly polished.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Is this friendly for someone who's never touched a Pokémon game?

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's not really a pokemon game, the similarity basically ends at: there are weird fighting animals you catch with round objects and take research notes on. There's no evolving, combat is an active battle rather than turn-based, combat participants are unlimited, your character participates in combat directly, you can catch people, you put what you catch to work for you at your camp, plus all the survival elements.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

you can catch people

Wait... what?

you put what you catch to work for you at your camp

Hmmm.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This and the obvious modern guns are what are giving me pause. Slaughtering cute pokemon and slavery.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But the ~~dog~~ pokemon fighting rings were okay?

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

No. Pokemon itself is definitely kidnapping and dog fighting. But at least it's cute and they disguise it a bit. This game seems (I haven't played yet, may check it out on GP) to throw off the veil and that squicks me out a bit.

Honestly if it wasn't for the Pokeball-horror, the fighting aspect would be more tolerable. It could then be pushed that you convinced pokemon to fight with you and they live good lives the rest of the time. Instead of either being in a state of stasis with the only thing they know is fighting, or being in literal prison when not fighting.

[–] MyDearWatson616@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nobody tell this guy about Rimworld

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Heh, I played it. But being super evil in that is very risky unless you have the (I forget?) psychopath trait. It's generally easier to be good in Rimworld for the shallow-end amount I've played it.

[–] TRBoom@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

With the Ideology DLC you can have a whole colony of monsters!

A nomadic group of nudist cannibals? Go right ahead!

A matriarchal society where men are property and must where burkas? Yes.

Cave dwelling mushroom eaters with an eye gouging ritual since they all crave to be blind. Absolutely!

And that's all without the families and babies DLC!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

If it helps, inside of a Pokeball it's supposed to be a simulated paradise for the pokemon, but that is also a form of cyber dystopia so ...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This game seems to have just as much of a veil as Pokemon games. It's not some "gritty reboot".

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 10 months ago

The steam page is pretty veil-off, they make it pretty clear that you gun down pals and can force them to work in factories literally to a death of starvation if you like.

I dunno if that carries through to the game, but the advertising definitely shows it

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

You can also slaughter the slaves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Phunter@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

I'd say yes.

load more comments
view more: next ›