this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
469 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

69038 readers
2388 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] r_deckard@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Looks like Australia will profit. We have a lot of lithium, and some of the others, china's been undercutting the price for a while.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I guess so, but to what end?

Are they expecting a global inflation given tariffs?

[–] carrion0409@lemm.ee 134 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The usa pissed off China so much they basically said "fuck all yall" 😭

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 111 points 5 days ago (4 children)

That‘s their default, though. It’s not the first time they‘re acting up as an unreliable business partner. I mean they bought all those rare earth mines across the globe for a reason and it‘s not to just stick it to the USA. They‘re both bullies.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago

yup. it's natural to see your foe's foe as an ally. always be wary.

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Great analogy. China and the US are the Kaiju, and the rest of the world are the people living in the cities we fight in.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

that isn't even a comparison. the fact china stopped sale of minerals doesn't put it in equal footing with the terror the us does.

[–] anonApril2025@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

China has been doing this for years.

[–] anonApril2025@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They've been completely cutting off these specific rare earth metals for years?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They've been buying up and hording rare earth metals for years to secure their own manufacture and as a form of soft power.

From 2011:

That’s because China now controls over 95% of the world’s supplies of rare earth metals, and has placed curbs on rare earth exports, creating a resource stranglehold. China slashed export quotas by 72% in the second half of last year, and imposed a further 35% cut in the first half of 2011 from the year-ago level. As a result prices for some rare earths have jumped more than 1,000%.

[–] anonApril2025@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So to the question I asked... No. They have not been cutting off these specific rare metals for years. They have restricted the supply to raise prices.

Thanks for confirming that china has not been completely cutting off supply to these rare metals for years.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

China has been playing a long game with rare earth metals. You asked a specific question, the answer of which wouldn't really explain anything. I gave you a longer answer that gives a fuller picture.

Trump and company were fools to trigger China like this.

[–] anonApril2025@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I agree. Also. China, previous to this point, didn't completely cut off these specific rare earth metals.

[–] smegger@aussie.zone 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They got what everyone wants, and they want to make sure everyone remembers that. No doubt prices will raise due to interrupted supply. China will probably benefit when they resume trade with selected countries

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No matter how you spin it, China comes out on top. They get to sit back while their main adversaries simply throw away every advantage they've built up over the last five decades or so. The only winning move is not to play...

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 29 points 5 days ago

Never interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake.

We're only in April, of year 1, this gonna be a long mistake.

[–] coffeeisblack@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The USA used to succeed due to all the brightest young minds wanting to immigrate and study in US universities.

Can’t really see anyone wanting to live in China, even just for study or work.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Seeing how things are going stateside and how poorly received American refugees are likely going to be anywhere, I'd consider it.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 72 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Most retailers have announced price hikes across the globe. I had hoped EU would actually get cheaper electronics and whatnot because of dumping. Oh well. Guess this 7 year old pc is going to have to sing it out for a few years longer at this rate.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 56 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'm just glad that as I get older I'm more content with simple things. I'd be ok giving up most tech things and I say that while working in IT myself.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Amen. I also work in IT and I find the longer I do, the more I loathe new tech stacks and developments. I used to be passionate about new tech and its applications. Now I just want to be left alone where possible.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

It's not necessarily you getting older; there is a fundamental difference in goals, aims and quality of software now. 99% of major software is either funded by VC or incumbent monopolists who are interested in extractions primarily and establishing moats, barriers to free and fair use, and any way possible to monetize an interaction. This is why those of us who lived through the actual innovation stages aren't excited anymore as it's clear this is not "progress" and the warning flags are there from the first marketing pitch.

This entire timeline though was part of the plan, it was never going to be free/cheap, functional and easily accessible forever. We are in the frog boiling phase now that doesn't end until we take back some of what has been lost.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

When the end times are here and you find yourself bored you can come by my cave and check my collection of cool rocks and sticks.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 days ago

no one hates new tech like IT guys

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm just trying to see my kid through college and then I'm ready for something simpler. Goatops.com (well a copy/paste from before the site existed) made me chuckle and planted the seed, now I'm in the actual consideration stage of it.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 17 points 5 days ago

I'm running the same desktop for nearky 14 years and I have two laptops that are over 8. Still daily use.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

China is encouraging other countries to find new sources which exist on every continent.

[–] Avg@lemm.ee 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

They are not nearly as rare as the name implies.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Check my understanding here: It's not that they're scarce, but there's no geological process that concentrates them like copper or gold. There aren't any neodymium seams the way there are gold seams, there's a very little amount everywhere. So you might as well sift the entire Mojave.

Yeah there's a reason people were saber rattling over those offshore deposits Japan claimed, and it's not because undersea mining is cheap and efficient or "they're on every continent what's the big deal"

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Finding the labor to mine and process it cheaply enough to maintain profit margins, while simultaneously deporting everyone, is what makes things rare.

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 days ago

The rarity is the ability to do it without caring about the massive environmental damage often caused while procuring the minerals.

[–] keyboardpithecus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Western industries like to cry foul. But if they did not do anything since these bans started about 20 years ago it means that they are happy with it.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago

Makes sense.

Geopoliticts shifts, good idea to just stop, wait and see who's ready to be on friendly terms.

Particularly in Europe, the result is like a few election cycles out. Could go in like 5 different directions and is impossible to predict.

[–] Ketchup@reddthat.com 9 points 4 days ago

Is it just that China doesn’t want them to go to another country and resold to the U.S. in another deal?

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

As opposed to what the headline could make you think, it’s not a complete ban on all REE exports. A total ban wouldn’t make much sense.

The REE business is big, and China can’t keep stockpiling these metals for long. Also, REE production is integrated to the rest of the industry, so you can’t just switch those factories off and expect everything else to keep on chugging along as usual.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)

China can afford to sit on these minerals for years or even decades. EU, US and Russia don't have that luxury.

Forcing others to find new suppliers is how you find out they built their own supply chains that exclude you. Business 201

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well what if you need to keep on producing more common metals in the meantime, and REEs are a byproduct. You would need to keep the REE factories running too.

If you end up with 100 tons of terbium and yttrium oxide sitting in bags out in the rain, it’s going to lead to some serious quality issues further down the line. Well, just shove them in a warehouse then?

You’ll need a big warehouse, and you need to keep building more of them every year as the stockpiles grow. Needless to say, there are some serious logistical problems with a total export ban. A partial restriction is more viable, because it gives China some time to figure out how to adapt.

In any case, the rest of the world needs these metals, and they are willing to bend to knee long before China runs out of mitigation strategies. It’s going to be a problem in China as well, but at least they’re not totally screwed.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The US manages to store 1.5B pounds of cheese it doesn't do anything with, I think China can handle constructing some warehouse to hold what it digs up from the ground.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

especially since china has multiple vacant metropolitan complexes.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

If China never wants to export REE again because other countries have built their own refineries sure, they can.