this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
258 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

74551 readers
4131 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The unsolicited offer is higher than Perplexity’s valuation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 165 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Well this is somehow much, much worse than Google

For those who missed it, perplexity is the one happily powering truth social's AI search with their logo front and centre

Remember your browser choices aren't that of everyone you know. Many of them will happily continue with Chrome and may end up looking at a profile of yours or something—just not using it is really not gonna cut it

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Oh that’s awful. I’m non-U.S. and didn’t know.

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Goshdarnit, and I was really enjoying perplexity and its relatively low hallucinations and good sourcing of information.

[–] d4rko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yea, me too, I got a cheap pro subscription and use it often. It is a fast way to find info for me. But I guess behind the scenes they are tracking us in the worst possible way.

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I did some checking around on the web and it seems that the partnership is a standard API license where Perplexity provides the technical infrastructure and Truth Social makes requests to there. The AI does contradict Trump regularly according to the Washington post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/10/truth-social-trump-ai-chatbot-perplexity/

So I'm not sure if this is massively wrong. Or at least, not as bad as I thought it would be.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

The CEO also said in an interview that he would use Chrome to mine endless amounts of user data. As the dead internet becomes a problem, he wants to use Chrome itself to detect when it’s being used by a human and scrape all the data they produce. I instantly uninstalled the Perplexity app after seeing that.

Sorry I can’t find the link.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 73 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Hmm I wonder how they intend to get 34 billion back from their investment?

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 71 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pumping that bubble some more.

[–] fuckyoukeith@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s bizarre to see how many people and companies don’t see a bubble, it seems so clear to me that yeah, machine learning will continue, but this current iteration isn’t something that people respond well to

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

C levels want to ride the bubble and have their golden parachutes ready for when it pops. Then they can use their 'experience' as an excuse to have their connections prop them up again to ride the next bubble!

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

These AI companies know damned well it's a bubble, they're not stupid, they just can't risk missing out on being the next Microsoft or Google or FaceBook. It's the highest stakes gamble I've ever seen and there's so much money tied up that it will crash the US economy when it pops.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't something that you don't respond to, sure. And here in social media you're surrounded by like-minded people. But perhaps AI is more popular with the general public than you think?

[–] danzabia@infosec.pub 4 points 2 weeks ago

I love that the Lemmy crowd thinks people don't like LLMs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dojan@pawb.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You kidding? Google Chrome has the biggest market share. It’s the window to the internet for many. Control that and you practically control the internet as a platform.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see you're really enjoying those BIG BLACK DICK videos on GAY PORNHUB. Would you be interested in preventing me from sharing this knowledge? I only ask for 0.01BTC in payment to not inform everyone in your social circle of your PECULIAR TASTES IN PORNOGRAPHY. --perplexity

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Appreciating a nice member is hardly a peculiar taste. They’d have to try much harder to shame me.

[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think he's being sarcastic.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Getting back? What is this, the purchase of a textile factory in 1900? All we trade these days is hype. I've transformed my mind into a fabulous factory for hype. I share my late-night infomercials with hollow dreams and empty glitz. Every morning, I wake up to a profit projection I crafted ages ago that concludes only one thing: I’m eternally destined to chase empty promises. My dazzling ambitions, my relentless optimism, my stubborn refusal to balk at the absurd—these have launched me on a glorious carousel where logic never intervenes.

I imagined changing the world without thinking about the real cost, and by the time I noticed, I had run out of backup plans. What am I offering? I’m stuck using the same old tricks to make empty promises seem exciting. I give up my integrity to sell dreams for someone else's imaginary future. I work tirelessly for a bright tomorrow that I know we'll never get to see. The drive that started all this will never get applause or a spotlight. So what do I give up? Everything!

spoilerCapitalist spin on Luthen's monologue

[–] vane@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We can buy anything with any amount of money.

Startups in 2025.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I will never cease to be amazed at how ungodly much cash startups often have.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

VC funding, baybeeeee

[–] kennedy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone else’s but theirs.

Our taxpayer dollars, since Perplexity is a huge backer of Truth Social

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

You might as well ask with what money ANYTHING in ai is getting done right now, because none of it is profitable. It’s investor cash.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 32 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

they know they can fork it and compile their own build for free right?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It would buying the name and user base and they already have a fork called Comet

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

my bad, kinda hard to get it through a text comment.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don’t feel bad. It looks to me like they made what they thought would be a clever comment but it turned out to be uninformed, and now they are saying “I was just joking.”

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I wasn't trying to make them feel bad, I thought the absurdity was clear. I will mark it the an /s next time

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

But they wouldn't have the user base, and therefore their data.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

lol this number makes no sense. Minecraft was worth 4 billion a decade ago. Chrome is worth way more than 34

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Good play to suck up data. I wonder if OpenAI, Palantir and others will bid too. Might be brilliant for Nvidia.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Palantir buying Chrome would be so cyberpunk it hurts.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

I offer $1000. That is probably higher than my evaluation. I would remove manifest V3 immediately.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ai needs data, you’re going to see more of this happening.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 7 points 2 weeks ago

AI needs customers. Chrome would become bloated with premium services

[–] NoodlePoint@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

AI startup Perplexity has offered Google $34.5 billion to buy the Chrome browser. The price might be below evaluation, but the company may be forced to sell the browser at the request of U.S. authorities as part of a case in which it was found guilty of being a monopoly.

https://x.com/80Level/status/1955488788861555082

Might as well be wanting all that juicy personal information from which to mine not only for profit but also for sending a SWAT team through the door without a court order and a search warrant. Or, sending a Hellfire missile through a window of a house somewhere in Pakistan.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Il offer 35 billion considering the entire economy at this point is made up inflated bullshit.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck it, I'll chip in a couple of billion too.

[–] CapnClenchJaw@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

How... perplexing!

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Good thing I haven't used Chrome in so long.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Wouldn't people just leave? I feel like that's such an easy thing to do these days. If they are too old, they probably weren't using Chrome anyway and default to edge since its just there. I know not everyone would, but I wonder what the percentage would be in the end. They have been killing it themselves lately with the removal of the blockers. I've been on Firefox for over a decade now. If Firefox did something like this, I would be gone in a day.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Never underestimate people’s stubbornness to stick with enshittified platforms.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

completely anecdotally, but the numbers of users of ublock origin have gone up a bit since manifest v3 was released, and thus removed ad blockers.

[–] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago

The vast majority of people will keep using whatever they are already used to unless there’s egregious changes that impact their workflows. Even then they might not move.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

People haven't left yet and it's already a data collecting beast. And blocks ad blockers. And so on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›