this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
656 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

74292 readers
6793 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/46522263

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] powerofm@lemmy.ca 67 points 4 days ago (7 children)

I guess I'm out of the loop: why do ppl hate forgejo?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Yeah, this is news to me. I think Codeberg runs on Forgejo, and just the other day people were singing its praises when GitHub became part of Microsoft's AI team. This feels like a sudden shift.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] toph@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago

Probably just the weird name. It makes it feel like someone’s weekend personal project.

I use it to self-host my own code and it works great, I’m totally moved off GitHub now.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

They probably don't. If you see a sudden FUD, it could be astroturfing.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago

I've never seen anyone hate on forgejo.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't even know how to pronounce it. Forge Joe? For Gay Ho?

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Any product name that needs a voice file to explain itself is a bad name 🤦 what were they thinking?

[–] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Forgejo (/forˈd͡ʒe.jo/ – inspired by forĝejo, the Esperanto word for forge)

source

[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

Rijndael is pronounced AES.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MrSmith@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Why do you think prople hate Forgejo?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I hadn't heard of Forgejo, although I realize now that I have seen repositories using it before. I think it's cool that they even have statically linked binaries of it but it's a bit concerning that like an entire web server is built in because what if there's vulnerabilities? I guess if you regularly stayed up to date it's not too bad then.

Edit: Oh, sounds like it's a fork of Gitea which I have heard of before, interesting.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 3 days ago

i mean, the web server in question is the Go standard library. if there is a vuln in there we have bigger problems, considering it's also used by the docker binary.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dyc3@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I apparently got blocked by their anti bot system on mobile

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I still find the name weird. Let's do something fun here; Comment what YOU think ForgeJo should be called instead

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago

YoForge

Read like "Science, bitch!"

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

On one hand, I kind of agree, on another that is at least somewhat a generic term for a gitlab/gitea/github/sourceforce/forgejo/etc, so it might be harder to search.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] embed_me@programming.dev 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For Joe

For Gay Joe

Both are fine by me

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›