this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
622 points (97.7% liked)

Fediverse

36685 readers
823 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] airportline@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I'd like to see what the metrics for the Fediverse would look like if it included federated Threads users.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

Capitalists love interoperability when they can use it to disrupt other capitalists. When they get in a dominant position they hate it.

It's basic enshittification theory.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 180 points 1 week ago (29 children)

So why does everyone keep referring to Bluesky as decentralized or even comparable to the fediverse

Bluesky is the newest iteration of privately owned and controlled social media

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 95 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

Because silicon valley thinks it can define reality however it wants and keep telling us not to believe our lying eyes.

Weirdly this seems to work better on techy people who don't like thinking about politics but understand the technical details of this extremely well than it does on normie progressives because progressives just see the obvious predatory reality and don't get distracted in minutiae connected to very obviously empty promises.

The tech press does not ever talk to progressives though...

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] 73QjabParc34Vebq@piefed.blahaj.zone 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

25% is too high, but at least it's not as embarrassing as 99%

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›