this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
367 points (97.2% liked)

Not The Onion

18344 readers
935 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 158 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 141 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The good news is this is illegal.

The bad news is Republicans probably don't care.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 136 points 1 week ago (10 children)

31 U.S. Code 5112 says “No coin issued may bear the image of a living former or current President,”

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 week ago

Yeah they won't care, they'll do it anyway, and then go after critics for being "unamerican" and "anti capitalist" per NSPM-7.

[–] Melkath@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago

I was about to say, I was pretty sure that was a law, instituted to stop... oh, what was it again? Oh ya. FASCISM.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Literally, who's going to stop them?

There's so much stuff that's absolutely illegal happening and nobody is stopping them. Being illegal or not is irrelevant if no one enforces it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh, this one's easy the way I understand things work now.

He is both former AND current, so fire up the mint.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

God damn XOR

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Amendment incoming!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 117 points 1 week ago (12 children)

This is illegal unless he dies

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh! Then I support this coin!

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah honestly at this point I want to see more unhinged shit so we can laugh at the history books.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

So is him running for a third term, but his office is filled with “Trump 2028” hats.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Since when during this admin was legality considered?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago

Yeah. I’m sure it being illegal will stop this.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only after he's been dead for 2 years or more can his visage be printed on a U.S. coin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] graycube@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

They may be expecting that.

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm not quite sure about this one. I think that the current design on the reverse is an issue. But the front doesn't seem to break any laws.

I'm assuming they print these under subsection Y of 31 U.S. Code § 5112 - Denominations, specifications, and design of coins. Which pertains to these 250th anniversary coins.

The part I see mentioned in this thread frequently applies to a separate subsection (n) for a run of $1 presidential coins that has since ended.

If you just read subsection Y in a vacuum, they are good to go. This part at the bottom though says that the reverse can't be a 'portrait'.

So this isn't really slam dunk illegal, but I don't think that the draft of the coins reverse will make it to print. I would fully expect the front to come out just like that though based on my interpretation.

(aa)Standards and General Provisions for Circulating Collectible Coins Under Subsections (x), (y), and (z).—

(1)Prohibition on certain representations.—

No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of any coin under subsections (x), (y), and (z).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How about printing his face on the Epstein Files instead

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

His face is already all over those files!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hcf@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is just bait for people to point out that it's illegal to commemorate a living president.

At which point they'll feign "oopsies" and—surprising absolutely nobody—proceed to roll out a Charlie Kirk coin.

[–] echo@lemmy.tf 6 points 1 week ago

There's already shitloads of ads out there for privately minted Kuck rounds

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 20 points 1 week ago

What is one more felony? Perhaps someone can be found guilty and sentenced to no punishment.

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago

Personality cult says what?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If such a coin exists ever exists, I hope all of them end up with deep scratches across the face.

Also, “Fight fight fight” sounds more like the Itchy and Scratchy theme song than some democratic saying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

How about we reopen the government and release the Epstein files first?

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NO living person should be commemorated on a coin, regardless of political ideology.

Hopefully, this abomination will go over about as well as the Sacajawea dollar coin.

[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 5 points 1 week ago

I loved those coins. Super easy to use in vending machines that could take them. Way better than fucking around with an old paper dollar.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

I knew it, Steven Miller has been “Weekend-at-Bernie’s”-ing him for two years and so now he’s eligible to have his face on money

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Surely a 30 cent (or maybe 70 cent or some other not really believable and pretty much useless) coin value would better represent Trump.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd say a 47¢ coin would be perfect. Plays into his ego, impossible to do math with so no one would actually use it, and it's a few cents short of a normal functioning thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Kings and queens have legal tender with their face on it during their tenure...

When is the official coronation of trump scheduled? 2027?

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's only one rule about whose faces can appear on currency in the US: the person has to be dead.

[–] Kimjongtooill@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

I mean, I can tolerate a $1 Trump coin if the stipulations are met....very very soon.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot...

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Great idea .... no better way to celebrate how stupid this country has become than by sharing another dumb image of this idiot.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT"

Sounds like inciting violence to me.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Given that it doesn't meet the legal requirements for currency but they would be passing it off as real money, it sounds more like counterfeiting to me. One more charge to add to the list.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Why the fuck not. The US didn't make it to 250; it's year 1 of post-US. Might as well.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago

Automatically devaluated to $zero.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 1 week ago

not a cult!

[–] FreeMindFreeAss@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

One time I came home drunk at night and had a campfire out back. For some reason, I had the urge to burn a few dollar bills that I had in my pocket, I think because money was such a concern for me at the time and the simple act of burning a few of these life-tickets upon which we all depend felt freeing.

Now this, I would invest in a torch and smelting pot for these ones. Or stamp Epstein on the other side and leave them strewn about.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Have them commission a trump trillion dollar coin to get the nation back on it's feet again and end the shutdown. His ego would love that idea and the rest of the country could get on with their business.

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

[...] it was long-standing tradition to only feature portraits of deceased individuals on currency and coin.

That tradition became law with an 1866 Act of Congress

Does the treasury department know something that we don't about events that may or may not happen before the anniversary?

load more comments
view more: next ›