742
Hahaha, what a story, Mark! Anyway, how's your sex life?
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
742 points (99.6% liked)
Not The Onion
18537 readers
1340 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"define 'sex'. no, wait... define 'life'."
Well, someone at facebook needs to come collect their jerk-off trophy.
Zuck, you dirty wanker.
I think they already came
yes, and epstein trafficked all those children to himself.
💀
As an aside, a great deal of CSAM is shared through Facebook, they've been asked by CSAM survivors to stop this and they said no. The advocacy survivor group Phoenix 11 submitted six formal questions in the US Congress to old Zuckface fuckface about it, as he deployed end to end encryption which makes this possible, which he dodged like the lying fuck he is. Zuck would sell it himself if it made him a whole dollar and nobody should forget that.
I completely disagree with your take here.
The idea that we shouldn't have services with end to end encryption because "think of the children" is an absurd take to have.
I think you're being upvoted because its anti Zuckerberg, but seriously people, think about the long term consequences of not being able to chat without being spied on.
Yeah, that argument is shit wrapped in a candy shell. Too many people'll swallow it without so much as a blink. 🥲
A case of indoctrination by the government, that's what they expect - a stream of false narratives utilising children as the weapon.
Which is frustrating as every single time the government wanted to expand surveillance on regular citizens, preventing this is always touted as the justification. Now we have all the surveillance and the monopolies are like 'Nah, exploitation is profitable'.
"So just to get this straight, you're saying you have downloaded 152 .... zettabytes .... of porn for your own personal use?"
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
load more comments
(3 replies)
Where did they get the idea that that's a more respectable response?
EDIT: Doesn't/shouldn't work for their liability either. Vocabulary fail on my part.
Dignity doesn't matter if it wins the case.
Welcome to Zucc's Fucc & Succ
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
Did anyone check on the Meta engineers in the goon cave?
You're joking but it was 2400 movies over 7 years downloaded individually and not in bulk like they blatantly did with books. Apparently over 60% of adults admit to have viewed porn at work so yeah... someone should probably check on the engineers in the goon cave.
load more comments
(7 replies)
"hey steve, did you download a shitton of porn while on the company network?"
"Uuuhhhhh, it's for ai training"
view more: next ›