Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Why confront the glaring issues with your "revolutionary" new toy when you could just suppress information instead
This was about sending a message: "stfu or suffer the consequences". Hence, subsequent people who encounter similar will think twice about reporting anything.
"Sign up for free access."
Nooo I was liking 404 :/ ~~Sucks to see them enshittified too..~~
edit: that was too harsh, I take it back.
I think they’ve always been like this for some of their posts, and honestly I’m considering getting a paid subscription to support them. Sucks, but they’ve been putting out quality content in exchange for your email address and some metrics - I’d call it a fair trade.
They are doing it because of AI scraper. But that is for some time now already
So in a just world, google would be heavily penalized for not only allowing csam on their servers, but also for violating their own tos with a customer?
We really don't want that first part to be law.
Section 230 was enacted as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 and is a crucial piece of legislation that protects online service providers and users from being held liable for content created by third parties. It is often cited as a foundational law that has allowed the internet to flourish by enabling platforms to host user-generated content without the fear of legal repercussions for that content.
Though I'm not sure if that applies to scraping other server's content. But I wouldn't say it's fair for the scraper to review everything. If we don't like that take, then we should illegalize scraping altogether, but I'm betting there are unwanted side effects to that.
While I agree with Section 230 in theory, it is often only used in practice to protect megacorps. For example, many Lemmy instances started getting spammed by CSAM after the Reddit API migration. It was very clearly some angry redditors who were trying to shut down instances, to try and keep people on Reddit.
But individual server owners were legitimately concerned that they could be held liable for the CSAM existing on their servers, even if they were not the ones who uploaded it. The concern was that Section 230 would be thrown out the window if the instance owners were just lone devs and not massive megacorps.
Especially since federation caused content to be cached whenever a user scrolled past another instance’s posts. So even if they moderated their own server’s content heavily (which wasn’t even possible with the mod tools that existed at the time), then there was still the risk that they’d end up cacheing CSAM from other instances. It led to a lot of instances moving from federation blacklists to whitelists instead. Basically, default to not federating with an instance, unless that instance owner takes the time to jump through some hoops and promises to moderate their own shit.
They were not only not allowing it, they immediately blocked the user's attempt to put it on their servers and banned the user for even trying. That's as far from allowing it as possible.
This, literally the only reason I could guess is that it is to teach AI to recognise childporn, but if that is the case, why is google going it instead of like, the FBI?
Who do you think the FBI would contract to do the work anyway 😬
Maybe not Google but it would sure be some private company. Our government doesn’t do stuff itself almost ever. It hires the private sector
My dumb ass sitting here confused for a solid minute thinking CSAM was in reference to a type of artillery.
Combined surface air munitions
Right I thought it was cyber security something or other like API keys now duck duck go probably thinks I'm a creep
Child sexual abuse material.
Is it just me or did anyone else know what "CSAM" was already?
I had no idea what the acronym was. Guess I'm just sheltered or something.
It goes to show: developers should make sure they don't make their livelihood dependent on access to Google services.
"stop noticing things" -Google
gill o' teens
Never heard that acronym before...
Not sure where it originates but it's the preferred term in UK policing and therefore most media reporting to refer to what might have been called "CP" on the interweb in the past as CSAM. Probably because porn implies it's art rather than crime, and also just a wider umbrella term
It's also more distinct. CP has many potential definitions. CSAM only has the one I'm aware of.
LOL, You mean the letters C and P can stand for lots of stuff. At first I thought you meant the term "child porn" was ambiguous.
Weirdly people have also been intentionally diluting the term to expand it to other things which causes a number of legal issues.
Lol why tf people downvoting that? Sorry I learned a new fucking thing jfc.
time for guillotines
Gemini likes twins...
...I'll see myself out.