this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
584 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4690 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

FYI: this is CHINA ONLY that they did this. With China being a totalitarianism shithole this was to be expected

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I don't know why this thread is complaining specifically about Chinese OEMs when Samsung has been doing this for years.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

Fuses... That's like what the first Switch did to try to deal with jailbreak.

[–] Mycenaman@lemmy.ml 91 points 2 days ago (12 children)

It's not flashing a custom ROM. It is installing an OS of users choice. Enemy's language shouldn't be used if we want things to change

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is why "side load" is annoying to me. It's installing. It is not special or different. They aren't "blocking side loading" they're "restricting what you can install."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ulterno@programming.dev 33 points 2 days ago

In better times, this would at least get a class action.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And yet my LinkedIn is still full of people complaining about how much the EU over-regulates

[–] razen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Cause that is expected of China but not EU

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 55 points 2 days ago

That means they were making money by people running their os.

If they spend the money on re-engineering their devices not to allow it, there was a cost advantage to selling your data.

[–] lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seriously are there any Android brands that do not suck and ship everywhere (not limited to the US/EU markets)??

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I believe thay all have shitty operating systems. But some of them have an aftermarket OS available. Pick your OS first, then look for a phone that can run it. Here are the ones I know of:

GrapheneOS

CalyxOS (on hiatus)

Crdriod

LineageOS

[–] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

google pixel with grapheneos maybe pixel 10 is pretty repairable hardware wise, some prior ones have glued in battery

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 38 points 2 days ago

"OnePlus shoots own foot. Likely to blame consumers for it"

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 211 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So never buy OnePlus products. Got it. Thanks OnePlus for making the advice so clear!

[–] anzo@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, this was the case shortly after they release of model 5T or around thst time. That's when they stopped being the only company that would provide instructions to root your device, and guess what... Back then, if you rooted your device the warranty was still valid!

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 70 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's what I heard. I know Samsung has been doing something like this as well.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 84 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Samsung has been blowing fuses in your phone when you root since at least 2015. I know because it happened to me. Never bought one again after that.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] stebator@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Many users were buying OpenPlus Pro smartphones solely because of the ability to unlock the bootloader and flash custom ROMs. People value freedom and customization. OpenPlus is shooting itself in the foot.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

Oppo killed and ate OP a long time ago. They've just been wearing their skin like a suit up to this point, but their true nature is obvious at this point.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 155 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Wow, what happened to OnePlus? They used to be so cool. Hell, the first one ran Cyanogen.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 126 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're basically being folded into Oppo right now. OnePlus as a company is pretty much dead.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

OnePlus is a Chinese company. Anybody who trusted a Chinese company to respect privacy, consumer rights, and ownership freedom is a complete idiot.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 62 points 2 days ago

Holy shit. I wanted to say something constructive, but just…. holy shit. Intentional hard brick of a customer owned device….

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wasn't OnePlus like worshipped because of how much support for custom ROMs wth

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The original "One" phone was even supposed to run cyanogemod out of the box at one point.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

It was shipped with Cyanogenmod for a while.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Yes they were and did for about 6 years, 2014-2020ish isn't a bad run

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago

"...long enough to become the villain."

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 32 points 2 days ago (5 children)

so it basically permanently "damages" the phone when you try to root it, seems like they are asking for a lawsuit at some point.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hornedfiend@piefed.social 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

One plus joined my short list of "I can't be bothered" companies like Samsung and Apple, Xiaomi, Oppo and some other sub par companies.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

OnePlus is owned by Oppo, so that’s applied for a while. Now they’re just making it clearly known

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

And all that while OnePlus was awesome up until the OnePlus 7 pro.

I had the 5t until last year and it was still awesome.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

If true, this is sabotage of the customers product, and must 100% be illegal in almost any country!!
But my guess is they are limiting this to countries that have absolute shit consumer protection.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] evol@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Miss my Oneplus 7 Pro. popup cameras <3

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bought my secondhand OnePlus 6T only last year. Installed Linux on it, and I love it. I'm using it as my daily driver.

Sent from my OnePlus 6T and from my bed

[–] Gebruikersnaam@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago

I also own a 6T as my main phone, but it seems LineageOS support had ended :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I bought a OP 9Pro just before Oppo decimated the company. They moved from Oxygen OS to a poorly camouflaged version of Oppo Color OS and stripped out some of the features that made Oneplus what it was. Oppo also almost completely stopped fixing bugs, even some really serious ones that had been long documented. I recently bought a new phone and didn't even consider ~~Oneplus~~ Oppo.

It seems to me that the only reason Oppo would do this is to preserve the revenue they get from selling customer data that should remain private. Otherwise why would Oppo care what OS people run on their hardware?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›