this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
269 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

80724 readers
3580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Damn. I though this thread was being hyperbolic but they really wrote it like Intel will, for the first time in their history, making GPUs lmao

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

I guess the Arc a750 in my workstation is imaginary?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 9 points 1 day ago

Slowpoke news

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Am I living in an alternate timeline? They've been making GPUs for quite some time- and B580 was actually pretty good, incredibly good for the price.

The problem with intel. They never just keep going. They announce some new gpu/graphics product and when it falls short they don't or wont stick with it. They abandon it and use it as a write off. They have done this multiple times and I have no reason to believe they will do anything different. The last time was just a few years ago and when sales and performance lagged they just quit.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 104 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like if ARC has never existed before?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Intel ARC is a GPU brand by Intel that are half the price of a typical Nvidia card at almost the same performance. They been unpopular due to shaky drivers but they have never been canceled. So, stating that Intel will finally enter GPU market is just plain misleading.

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

English clearly isn't their first language, but the intent is pretty obviously "As if they aren't already making ARC GPUs?"

[–] wioum@lemmy.world 261 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I had to check the date on the article. They've been making GPUs for 3 years now, but I guess this announcement--although weird--is a sign that Arc is here to stay, which is good news.

[–] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 114 points 2 days ago (7 children)

This article was based off what the CEO said at the Second Annual AI Summit, following the news of their new head of GPU hire who says he "will lead GPU engineering with a focus on AI at Intel". The AI pivot is the actual news.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 4 hours ago

I was sure their focus was already on AI. Bought an Arc a770 when I first built my PC. It was alright, but the gaming aspect had a lot of flaws.

Each driver update had some improvements, but the bulk of it felt like AI bullshit.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

focus on AI

Never mind guys, it's a nothing burger

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh so they will actually not focus on GPUs as end consumer products for you and me. They’re just like Nvidia and AMD. This news really just shows how cooked gaming is.

[–] atthecoast@feddit.nl 3 points 2 days ago

I don’t know, perhaps gaming will get rejected AI chips with a few cores broken. The chip design requirements are slightly different but not completely foreign

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just what every consumer needs. More AI focused chips.

Intel just trying to cash in on the AI hype to buy the sinking ship, as far as investors are concerned.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Don't worry, it's just a relabeling. The stuff is still the same.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

It's not even a pivot. They've been focusing on AI already. I'm sure they want it to seem like a pivot (and build up hype); the times before apparently just having the hardware and software wasn't enough. nobody cared when the gaudi cards came out, nobody uses sycl or onednn, etc

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

It feels like TechCrunch is allowing a drunk Ai to write all its articles now.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Weird, they're a bit late boarding this train as it already starts to derail...MS just stumbled hard as their AI shit isn't paying off and it drives consumers away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The actual chips are farmed out to TSMC, I don't believe they've made any in house so I'm guessing maybe they've decided that they're going to do that sometimes now? But then, even some of their CPUs are made by TSMC so I could be on a very wrong path.

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

TSMC is how they stay competitive; that’s what everyone else uses

Intel is still catching up with 18A

The 18A production node itself is designed to prove that Intel can not only create a compelling CPU architecture but also manufacture it internally on a technology node competitive with TSMC's best offerings.

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intels-18a-production-starts-before-tsmcs-competing-n2-tech-heres-how-the-two-process-nodes-compare

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 4 points 2 days ago

thanks for your effort

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tom Peterson, who's been working at Intel for half a decade: Am I a joke to you

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

No, now they're going to make good video cards!

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well that article was a waste of space. Intel has already stepped into the GPU market with their ARC cards, so at the very least the article should contain a clarification on what the CEO meant.

And I see people shitting on the arc cards. The cards are not bad. Last time I checked the B580 had performance comparable to the 4060 for half the cost. The hardware is good, it's simply meant for budget builds. And of course the drivers have been an issue, but drivers can be improved and last time I checked Intel is actually getting better with their drivers. It's not perfect but we can't expect perfect. Even the gold standard of drivers, Nvidia, has been slipping in the last year.

All is to say, I don't understand the hate. Do we not want competition in the GPU space? Are we supposed to have Nvidia and AMD forever until AMD gives up because it becomes too expensive to compete with Nvidia? I'd like it to be someone else than Intel but as long as the price comes down I don't care who brings it down.

And to be clear, if Intels new strategy is keeping the prices as they are I'm all for "fuck Intel".

[–] Sineljora@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The USA owns 10% of the company, which might turn off some.

This is a big part of it, imo. They kissed the ring.

The other part of it is that, per the article, this is an “AI” pivot. This is not them making more consumer-oriented GPUs. Which is frustrating, because they absolutely could be a viable competitor in low-mid tier if they wanted to. But “AI” is (for now) much more lucrative. We’ll see how long that lasts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkness343@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Oh no, Nvidia's pet is rebelling. Maybe they should be remindes of their current status

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What the fuck? What kind of idiotic article is that? Did Techcrunch go down the drain too?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't know if "GPUs" is the right term, but the only area where we're seeing large gains in computational capacity now is in parallel compute, so I'd imagine that if Intel intends to be doing high performance computation stuff moving forward, they probably want to be doing parallel compute too.

[–] badabim@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The term you're looking for is GPGPU (General Purpose computing on GPU)

[–] angrywaffle@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't Nvidia have $5bi stakes of intel? I wonder how that influences their decisions.

load more comments
view more: next ›