this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
98 points (97.1% liked)

Games

46087 readers
1345 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 3 hours ago

Blizzard hasn't been good since they sold out to Activision.

[–] washbasin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

StarCraft Brood War pro scene is still going strong! I encourage anyone curious about SC to dip back into the active pro scene. A new season of ASL (GSL of old) is going to start in the next month, or so. And for the sickos, Artosis has a daily YouTube of matches. His enthusiasm is unmatched.

[–] RainbowBlite@piefed.ca 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I want an awesome RTS, like Wings of Liberty, but I would absolutely play a StarCraft shooter with a really good story and gameplay. I have zero interest in another Overwatch or extraction shooter. I expect another low-effort reskin.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Firing up the new Starcraft shooter, the female voice in your coms says: "Run down this hallway, you're going to need to prove you know how to crouch and jump over obstacles before you can learn how to switch weapon modes!"

yeah, I am gonna need something really special to get excited about another FPS shooter no matter what the wallpaper looks like.

[–] grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

After everything they've done to their other key franchises... Surely no one is going to fall for this, right?

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Do you even cell phone bro?

[–] teft@piefed.social 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Give us Ghost you cowards.

[–] dai@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You can play it on the original Xbox, there was a leak maybe 2020 of a prerelease / wip.

I should grab some screencaptures of the ingame, but I'm sure there are plenty out there.

[–] gravitas@lem.ugh.im 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So are they going to do another game thats pretty much just a reskin like when they turned that chinese mobile game into a diablo game?

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 5 points 6 hours ago

Do you guys not have phones?

[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 43 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Let's take something arguably genre defining and turn it into a fad chaser! Great idea.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Let’s take everything the fans love about Starcraft and throw it away. Once we have a soulless aesthetic husk remaining we can slap it in to any piece of shit and count on nostalgia to bring in the buyers!

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Something needs to fill the gaping hole left behind after Concord's death.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Why would branching out with a successful IP be bad? Are you mad at all the Warhammer games? Does Vermintide's existence cheapen the Total War games?

[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 25 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You’re arguing against a position nobody stated. My criticism isn’t that an IP ever appears in another genre. It is the pattern of publishers repurposing established strategy franchises into monetization-friendly live-service shooters because that market is larger and more predictable.

Warhammer is a poor comparison. Games like Vermintide didn’t replace or redefine Warhammer; they existed alongside a still-supported core genre identity. The RTS space around StarCraft has effectively been abandoned for years. So when the first meaningful revival rumor turns out to be a shooter, I read it less as expansion and more as substitution.

If Blizzard announced a new RTS and also a shooter spin-off, I would not be critical. The reaction is about genre displacement, not genre diversification.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 1 points 43 minutes ago

So you would rather get no Starcraft games than get a Starcraft game that is not an RTS?

Because I don't know if you've looked at the numbers but RTS is pretty much dead. One of the biggest RTS-s of the past 5 years was a remaster of Age of Mythology and that sold less than a million units. Starcraft 3 would have to sell something like 3 million units at launch and have an estimate of hitting at least 7 million in 2 years, because ActiBliz has certain expectation for sales and those expectations far exceed what Starcraft 2 sold in its entire lifetime. Starcraft would have to sell Diablo numbers.

I'd be very surprised if we ever saw another mainline Starcraft RTS. I don't think we'll be seeing another Warcraft RTS either.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 27 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Don't get my hopes up for StarCraft: Ghost again! I know you'll just disappoint me. 😩

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

[Two years from now]: "Don't you guys have phones?"

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Current Blizzard wouldn't have cancelled Ghost.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 7 points 13 hours ago

I wouldn't hold my breath.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 12 points 12 hours ago

Oh boy... I see lots of crunch in the future of those poor devs.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 8 points 11 hours ago

Sure, why the heck not 🤷

🤷

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago

Weird idea but bear with me: They could, and this will shock some of you, I hope you're sitting in a safe position ... They could revive Starcraft as fucking Starcraft!

[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Question will be if there's going to be a single player component. Back then StarCraft had a beloved universe and characters. Post StarCraft 2 - the universe and those beloved characters aren't so beloved anymore. SC2 and expansions may have been worse than Veilguard for their fanbases in terms of universal disappointment over the stories

[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 11 points 12 hours ago

I'm just glad I got a tiny bit of closure for Raynor and Kerrigan before Blizzard went full enshittification

[–] bishoponarope@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Was it really so poorly received? I gotta admit I enjoyed SC2 and was happy to finish out the story, but was much less critical of games etc in my younger years, and have not gone back to play it again since. The ending on disable 3 though, boy was I unimpressed.

[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"Now with less SA" -Blizzard, probably.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Saudi Arabia or Sexual Assault?

[–] meerstyler@feddit.org 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Is it gonna be pay-to-win?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Pay to buy, pay to play, pay to get upgrades, pay to get the best ending, pay to not play. (You will have to use premium currency to set the game down for more than a day or lose all progress.)

[–] JakoJakoJako13@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

ZeroSpace you're our only hope. Please be the Tempest Rising to Command and Conquer that StarCraft needs.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago

First time hearing about this. It sure looks promising.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago