this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
450 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

82296 readers
4371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/47449079

I stumbled across this link in the comment of another post, and thought it was super promising!

Someone mentioned something about in the US, this would be illegal due to DRM laws - not sure about the specifics of this, but regardless an open source printer seems like something we've needed for ages, as printers are something that always seem like way more of a headache then they need to be. It seems like such a simple technology that has existed for quite some time, but they are always such a pain to deal with. (Maybe it's just my bad luck with printers?)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] timestatic@feddit.org 69 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

FYI its not actually open source. Its a cool idea but you can't actually sell it or sell derivatives of it. Even at zero-sum. This hinders any actual forks from being successful, as any intention to sell the product (even without aiming for profits) is forbidden by their license. It just allows for tinkerers as contributors without properly allowing forks. Makes me a bit sad tbh, because its so close to being awesome.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago

Well that's disappointing.

[–] pokexpert30@jlai.lu 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the classic "if you can't build it yourself you don't deserve it". Very cool, surely people will not go for an older laser printer instead.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

No they sell it, but only the founders themselves. So better than a modern DRM HP Printer but still, not really FOSS sadly. I hope they change their mind on the license

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Illegal due to US govt wanting discrete traceable patterns printed so they can track money duplication on colour printer or track Ransom letters?

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good thing I live outside of the US then ;)

This looks awesome...hope they make it, I'd buy one if it isn't toooo expensive.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I imagine that similar regulations exist in the EU. For instance, no copy machine will let you copy a Euro bill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that's the anti-copy mechamism I recall reading about long ago. I wonder if/how this project will deal with that?

[–] kubica@fedia.io 26 points 2 weeks ago

Freedom strikes again.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

So what? Thats exactly why I WANT a custom built printer, fucking spying shits.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well, it being open source helps get around that

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where are you seeing that it’s illegal? I own a pen plotter that can print things without tracking dots and that’s not illegal. I don’t see why this would be any different.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was a question. And wasn't pen plotters since they can't reproduce money, and are more rare for consumers

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Using the tool for illegal activities is illegal, owning a printer capable of producing fake notes isn’t.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the original query was are these illegal to sell in USA due to not having FBI traceability?

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m saying no. I could find nothing on the books that prohibits specific printer tech or mandates hidden tracing be added for it to be legal.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Come and Take it

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nope, this was only done on laser printers and not all of them.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My non laser colour had it. Left yellow dots on photos, drove me crazy

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

https://www.eff.org/issues/printers

Not legal, it's not a law. The government "persuaded" the manufacturers.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is an ink jet printer that uses HP print head / ink cartridges.. Fwiw, repairable impact printers have been around longer than computers. Think of old fashioned teleprinters. Noisy, but likely to survive the apocalypse.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where're ya gonna get sprocket-feed fanfold paper these days, though, let alone in the apocalypse?

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm curious how they source the ink.

I recently watched a video about a 3D printer with color that is effectively obsolete because it used what was once common hp cartridges that hp discontinued.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you lean on any proprietary component, any printing company is going to intentionally make you obsolete. For them, it's a no-brainer.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

As another replier said, they use an HP cartridge. So this open printer will be ewaste in 5 years

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago

HP print cartridges.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 weeks ago

99% of the difficulty is in the proprietary HP printheads they're using. Once hp realizes they're being used for this, they'll cut them out of the market in the bat of an eye.

it's cool but it's still based on parts that degrade and you can't manufacture.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In a world of homebrew 3D printers and CNC machines, it's kinda weird there never was a similar option for a regular printer.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

2D printers are way more difficult than 3D printers. The only reason we didn't have 3D printers in the 90s is Stratasys and their stranglehold patents. Hobby-level 3D printers only became a thing because the Stratasys patents expired.

Before that they were just able to ask for €70k for what's essentially a cheap ABS FDM printer.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Because printers generally just worked and buying OEM expensive refills was a temporary discomfort that, if it bothered you enough, you could work around by getting third party refills and save some money.

But since they’ve started locking down printers to reject refilled cartridges and third party cartridges it’s come to a head and people are looking for alternatives.

3D and CNC are entirely different animals, for multiple reasons. There were pretty much zero hobbyist devices and the available ones were so far out of reach that nobody could afford them except prototyping labs or manufacturers. The hobbyists did most of the legwork making 3D printers and home CNC work before manufacturers decided it was worth getting into the technology. Nobody needed really needed them like paper printers were needed for everything from school work to everyday business.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This isn't new. I remember seeing a promotion for this exact same printer many years ago already. I'd approach it with suspicion.

[–] UNY0N@lemmy.wtf 6 points 2 weeks ago

I had the same thought. I signed up to be notified when the project starts, but never got an email.

Perhaps they have just had massive delays, but I too would suggest caution.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 16 points 2 weeks ago

Of all the available printer cartridges, they chose those from HP? Eeeeew

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I like all my documents to curl up.

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 18 points 2 weeks ago

You can print on standard sheets or paper rolls and choose between black or color cartridges, refillable at your convenience.

[–] lung@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I unironically want this to make wizard scrolls

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds great. I can't figure out what the status is. Working prototype? Manufacturing?

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'm disappointed they say coming soon. Laat year or so, when they announced it, everyone assumed immediate availability.

[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It’s going to break doesn’t matter that it is open source. It’s a printer at heart.

[–] SergeantGarcia@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Printers can work. At work we have these big canon plotters for big posters. They are basically super size inkjet printers. They have been printing for years and they never need maintenance.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's why they're hyping the repairability.

And it will still need cyan to print a bw document lol!

load more comments
view more: next ›