this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
478 points (96.5% liked)

Not The Onion

20775 readers
1639 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘It is rule 62 of the Olympic Charter that we have to have a condoms story,’ says IOC spokesman Mark Adams

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Steve@communick.news 143 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

While I don't doubt many athletes are being quite active.
I'd also believe it's a joke at this point for them to all take as many as they can no matter if they intend to use them or not.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 46 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There was an article a few years ago where a few athletes were interviewed anonymously IIRC. It's a fuckfest. You put a lot of people in peak physical shape together, what are you expecting?

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Also people who by and large havent been out living wild social lives for quite a while. Laser beam focused on one goal. Once you have competed, one way or another the pressure is off and you are surrounded by people who are in the exact same position.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 10 points 3 weeks ago

you are surrounded by people who are in the exact same position.

Or, due to physicality and flexibility, some new positions!

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 40 points 3 weeks ago

You roll initiative onto someone and they pull out one of these bad boys, and I call that a 'power move'.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

A few years ago an athlete said in an interview that they are Olympics branded condoms, so he stuffed his backpack full of them

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Let them. How is this not huge free publicity!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 89 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In France, they gave 300k condoms. That's 30x the amount they gave here. And they used them all in France, how long the fuck did they think those 10k would last?

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For what it's worth, there are more people at the summer Olympics than the winter ones (~10,500 in Paris and ~2,900 at Milan according to Wikipedia) but still one would think there should at least be 1/4 as much if they're just looking at athlete numbers alone.

[–] coherent_domain@infosec.pub 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

10k for 20 days of olympic and for 3k athletes that is 10k * 2 / 20 / 3k = 1/3 of a condom per couple per day, that sounds down right reasonable for a bunch of young, perfectly shaped teenagers constantly in celebration mode.

[–] mracton@piefed.social 27 points 3 weeks ago

I wouldn’t want to share a condom with two other couples each day. That’s barbaric. /j

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think Brazil gave out 400.000

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 79 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's less than 4 per athlete, not sure why they thought that would be enough.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

They ended up only having a little over 2 per athlete after Condoms Georg took 4,000 for balloon animals.

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Per athlete or pair of athletes? I'm too lazy to Google

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Per athlete. It's about 6 and a half per male athlete.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which poor guy has half a Dingdong?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 78 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You want more olympians, this is how you get more olympians.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

this is how you get more olympians.

If enough people are in the market, have egg or sperm donor companies call people who medal.

considers

Looking down the road, because my expectation is that sooner or later, we're going to be doing human genetic engineering, a company getting Olympian genetic material like that might be


as long as they can operate in a legal jurisdiction that doesn't prohibit human genetic engineering


better off just calling up medalists and licensing their DNA. I don't think that you can copyright DNA under current US case law, though it might be patentable.

investigates

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_genetic_sequences

As of 2016, genetic sequences were not recognized as copyrightable subject matter by any jurisdiction.[3] The United States Copyright Office's position is that "DNA sequences and other genetic, biological, or chemical substances or compounds, regardless of whether they are man-made or produced by nature," are ideas, systems, or discoveries rather than copyrightable works of authorship.[15]: 23 

You might not need to copyright or patent it, though, if you can just keep the changes you make secret. I mean, you get sperm/egg from Random Person, you do your proprietary modifications, you generate an embryo, you implant. I'm not sure how hard it would be for some other company to reverse-engineer the changes by looking at people's DNA relative to background noise in the DNA.

searches

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33095042/

A large majority of countries (96 out of 106) surveyed have policy documents-legislation, regulations, guidelines, codes, and international treaties-relevant to the use of genome editing to modify early-stage human embryos, gametes, or their precursor cells. Most of these 96 countries do not have policies that specifically address the use of genetically modified in vitro embryos in laboratory research (germline genome editing); of those that do, 23 prohibit this research and 11 explicitly permit it. Seventy-five of the 96 countries prohibit the use of genetically modified in vitro embryos to initiate a pregnancy (heritable genome editing). Five of these 75 countries provide exceptions to their prohibitions. No country explicitly permits heritable human genome editing.

The thing is that in practice, if you want in vitro implantation, you can probably just travel abroad to a jurisdiction that doesn't prohibit it, unless countries assert extraterritorial jurisdiction that attaches to their citizens. If someone wants an Olympianized kid, I imagine that traveling abroad isn't that much additional barrier. Extraterrorial jurisdiction exists, but it is very rare; prohibitions on child sex tourism are one notable example that a number of countries do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritorial_jurisdiction

EDIT: Replaced the text and citation for the legal overview, as it looks like the earlier link was to a spam site that copied it.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Take it from me, you don't want to go down the "eugenics" road...

[–] stephan262@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I have a feeling it's gonna be a long road, getting from here to there with eugenics. I'd much rather use technology to overcome our limitations.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sir, we did it, we got Olympian sperm!

Excellent, what sport?

Shot put 

Fuck. 

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Forget in vitro, just CRISPR that shit into my DNA!

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Um, that's not how condoms works.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

If only they didn’t run out of them.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don’t see why condom companies aren’t shipping in truckloads for free. You can’t beat that kind of publicity. L

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This reads like the startn of Dr Seuss erotica

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I found myself in Italy
They said we could have condoms free
All partnered up by two or three
Everyone partook with glee
But now none are left for me

So hearken friends
My luck portends
This story ends
For me unfortunately

I skied directly into a tree
Then rolled the dice in the dormitory
It now burns badly when I pee
I hope my mom is proud of me
I only brought home an STD

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 9 points 3 weeks ago

You can’t beat

🤔

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

If I was an athlete and there were condoms with Olympic logo branding getting handed out, I would SO hoard them for souvenirs. Can you imagine?

They're in Italy. There are farmacie all over the place. They can get store-brand ones.

Edit: Yup. Olympic Games branding. Goes in the scrapbook album. Unused, mind you.

Edit 2: https://lemmy.world/post/43193842

[–] T156@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Plus they're officially branded, not some knockoff. It would be an amazing gag gift.

[–] harrybo93@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

gag gift??? Wrong kink, my friend

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 44 points 3 weeks ago

Young, fit and healthy athletes, following intense build up and cumulative training are ready to peak explosively, just about now.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn’t this happen virtually every year?

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah sounds like PR at this point. They probably release this press message every year right when viewership and interest drops when the Olympics is halfway done.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Best souvenir going. But also a lot of young people in peak physical condition. As someone I know commented "everyone is 10/10 from the neck down."

[–] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And those people have higher than average testosterone, so they're hornier. Apparently Olympic Village is a small orgy, hence all the condoms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

All because of Jimmy fucksalot and his massive cock

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago

he dropped his magnum condom for his magnum dong.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

10'000 is super low, I remember hearing about one or two hundred thousand in recent years. I guess that was regular and not winter, but still. No wonder they ran out.

[–] X@piefed.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Winter Olympics, probably fewer people than the summer Olympics, where they had 300k.

[–] Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

And I find condoms past the expiration date.

load more comments
view more: next ›