this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
1365 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
5040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is sign that Google is worried that a market of 500 million people could decide to move away from the US tech giants. Very worried, judging by this flimsy fear-driven argument. Good.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

I hope Europe plays hard ball to over leverage the tech companies, then rips the rug out from under them. Tech companies will amplify even the smallest portions of American frustration, projecting it as a larger problem for the public than it actually is… but I for one will support Europe in playing dirty. Glad, even.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement.

Are we in a context of rapid technological advancement ? I would say we are in a context of dire technological stagnation.

«AI» is a mirage that is utterly failing at pretty much everything it is applied to, and in every other domain I would say tech progress is coming to a halt now that our new feudal lords have conquered so much of the market.

This push by the EU is, apart from digital sovereignty, a very necessary push to get some innovation going again. I hope more complementary measures will follow ; we really need hardware sovereignty as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago
[–] DeuxChevaux@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness.

Google's competitiveness only.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Alarm Systems Bad For Business, Burglar Claims

[–] parson0@startrek.website 24 points 1 week ago

Google and their big tech buddies made their choice by supporting Trump's regime. I know actions have consequences is a concept that doesn't apply in the US, but elsewhere it does. Deal with it.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

YSK that this is a) ragebait farming you for ad revenue and b) disinformation.

In the FT article referenced, there is no mention of open source.

Neither on his LI, which has a free access link to the FT article: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/kent-walker-5963bb198_google-warns-eu-against-erecting-walls-activity-7428100995995398144-I9Ac

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago

The irony is that Google uses FOSS software in a huge way since its founding.

Free and Open Source Software for me, but not for thee, Europe.

Fuck Google's hypocrisy. And fuck Google/Alphabet.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

This is good. It means that the efforts are working and Google is getting nervous. Let them get nervous and let’s give them a lot more to be nervous about.

[–] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ooooo, someone's getting worried!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago

Google telling the EU that the EU needs Google feels a lot like Cops investigating themselves and finding that they did nothing wrong.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

"Buy my shovel! Don't buy that other guys shovel!" Ah, capitalism, you crazy old whore.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What innovation, Google? Like threatening all Android devs?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MattGade@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

lol. lmao, even.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago

I hope that Europe offers a grant to developers who make open-source software. Stuff like Matrix, Fluxer, Lemmy, and so on. Making the development of such software into a paying job will accelerate the OSS scene and give Europe more viable options.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago

What a preposterous argument google is making. Yes it stifles innovation having open source software and not licensing it from the soul-less mega corporation with the US government willing to break kneecaps for it (if they pay up,) that we know helps the US steal information, and themselves steals every big of information they can get their grasping hands on, both legally and illegally.

Yes Europe wouldn't have the best tools, if they weren't beholden to a mega corporation that could use the out of control drunk with power US to back up their market interests! Talk about an incredible argument. We will see, I bet europe caves to US pressure, as they did all last year, and just goes along with tech plans to bring the trojan horses of chatcontrol and age checks inside the walls of liberal democracies, to ultimately make secret social scores to determine every part of how a person is treated from business to government. Those decisions made by the worst people in the world like Palantir in cooperation with politicians.

As to keeping data in europe so the us couldn't access it, ha. What were you born yesterday? Google is beholden to the US that can make or break them in a thousand million ways. They will find a way, (they already have,) to grab all the data, stored in europe or whereever. You know it, same way we knew before snowden the feds were grabbing everything they could get their grasping hands on.

Because who is going to stop them?

[–] mayabuttreeks@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 16 points 1 week ago

Why would anyone want €100 billion in economic growth from open source investments when you can give the CIA all your data and gain access to innovative new ways to generate AI slop?

[–] Itwasntme223@discuss.online 16 points 1 week ago

Google is secretly panicking cause they lost an entire nation bloc. That's gotta hurt the pocket book somewhere.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

Guys, what you need to do to be competetive, to foster competition... is keep using all our products and services.

Setting up a fund to get new people involved, to get some more money to existing software devs who work on comparable products and servicrs that could be expanded and improved?

No no no, thats uh, that's anti-competetive, is what that is.

Mhm.

Yep.

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection.

Simultaneously, those same companies are actively lobbying the EU to dismantle those protections.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Open Source software is in many cases better than commercial software. Consider Linux / Windows.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

could stifle innovation

What is there to innovate? It’s just email and cloud storage. It’s not like these governments use Google’s latest AI tools. Google hasn’t done shit to innovate Gmail and Google Drive in the last 15 years. And Google’s Trojan horse called Chrome has actually stifled the internet. Google now has way too much power over browser standards and thus how the web should work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

Thanks you for your concerns, Google. Now, fuck you.

[–] Kualdir@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Absolutely brilliant, the company that will be affected the most together with Microslop says its not a good idea to stop paying them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trougnouf@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They are well aware that US companies placing servers in the EU does nothing for "data sovereignty", they are bound by the Cloud Act so anything the US government demands takes precedence over the GDPR / EU regulations (which are therefore legally impossible to comply with).

[–] DevotedShitStain69@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Fuck Google!

[–] klay1@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

bad for competition? If people want FOSS software, well go make a good product then!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›