this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
961 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

82296 readers
4371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Translation feature seems to be classified under AI. Idk what technology does it actually use, but it's done locally on device

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 14 points 1 week ago (20 children)

@avidamoeba@lemmy.ca @technology@lemmy.world

The problem still remains: why's this thing "opt-out" and not "opt-in"? Why not make it an official, totally optional (as in voluntarily wanting to have it and, only then, proceeding to have it) plug-in or extension that the user (let us remember the meaning of "User Agent": an agent acting on behalf of the user, not a piece of software who's become "the user") could install at any moment, out of their own will?

I'm far from being an anti-AI person, I myself use those clankers on a daily basis. However, I use them because I want to, while I still want to, not because they were pushed unto me.

Mechanisms of "opt-out" where there should be an "opt-in" is a form of dark pattern.

In fact, the very concept of "opting-out" is a dark pattern per se, because it implies something pushed unto a person, something from which they were "allowed" the "right to leave".

Yeah, it's awesome to have means of "opting-out" from something, but having an "opt-out" mechanism in place doesn't mitigate the very fact that it was coercively pushed unto the person beforehand and didn't require explicit consent from the person unto which the thing was pushed.

Speaking of "consent", situations like these are not that much different from the dark pattern "Yes / Not now" we've been seen everywhere: in certain scenarious, this insistence and disregard for explicit consent would verge the criminal (e.g. harassment), but suddenly it's "okay" when corporations (and the State itself) do it.

If, say, a situation where someone is being harassed and, only after having started to harass, the harasser offers the harassed a means to leave the harassment, does this make the harasser less of a harasser? Because that's the same absurd logic behind the corporate advocacy whenever it's said "oh, but Mozilla is offering an opt-out, you can always turn off 'sponsored shortcuts' (that is, after having been faced by the shortcut from a Jeff Bezos corp as you proceeded to open a new tab for accessing the opting-out settings, but that's totally okay), 'sponsored wallpapers', and the 'Anonym tracking', and now you can, check this out, you can turn off the clankers, too! Wow, isn't that such a cute corp, the corp with the cute fiery fox mascot?".

Not to say how it's gonna end up cluttering the upstream with (more) binary blobs, adding to the Sisyphean struggle that WaterFox, IronFox, LibreWolf, Fennec, among other Firefox forks, have been experiencing upon trying to de-enshittificate the enshittificated and de-combobulate the combobulated.

"Mozilla needs to make money". Yeah, yeah, because the very fundamental, immutable principle of cosmic existence boils down to "there's no such thing as a free lunch", amirite? After all, "money" is clearly within the table of elementary particles alongside quarks and gluons, isn't it? And Mozilla needs to make money... We had a tool for that: it's called donations.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If it's opt-in it may as well not exist. For whatever reason, they have decided it's important.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] massacre@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

So, there's a "bug", though I expect to FF it's a feature: If you individually block all of the AI features, then click on the master switch to block all AI, everything's great. But if you revert that master switch suddenly it "forgets" all of your settings and shit is activated again.

It seems by design. And since it's opt in, if FF "accidentally" disables the master switch (I'm betting it will eventually) you lose that extra layer of protection. OH, and I had disabled EVERYTHING in registry (about:config) before this and translations were still available. I guess it's time for me to explore other FF-core options....

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's just a lazy/poor design.

Instead of each setting having its own bit with one 'override' bit, they just set override by setting each bit.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'd say you're being generous calling it poor design. It's actually reverting to "default" on settings when you uncheck instead of storing individual bits and honoring those. Why not revert to opted out - OK, that may be lazy to use a single template, but that's not the way some of their other "master" options work. And I've been a FF user since it's first releases, so this isn't some Mozilla hate. And I won't be going to anything Chromium and because of inertia I may just stick to FF.

It's also crazy that I have been manually configuring away from AI since it wasn't even opt out... it was forced in. Most aren't going to do that and Mozilla knew it going in. And I've already seen those registry settings revert once. Since this control option literally should have been the first feature for AI delivered and their entire AI push has an untrustworthy stink, I'll say it again: I await a future release bumping the setting back "on". "Oopsie! you can just turn it back off or wait for the next patch" after Mozilla and their partners collect their information across millions of users that aren't paying attention.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I started using Zen Browser, it’s a fork of FF. Sick of this Mozilla nonsense

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The only people that are into LLMs are scientist (which is reasonable) and tech bros.

The later just think it's useful while for 99% of people there just isn't a usecase.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago

Im super happy to see so many upvotes for this most excellent browser!

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I'm going to unblock telemetry just long enough for them to see me hit this kill switch

[–] Dazed_Confused@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

So while previously the translation feature was supported by an extension, now it has to be enabled through ai.

Hate it.

[–] Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I like playing around with them occasionally, but I only use local models. I cannot stand all the cloud stuff in general and with the way neural nets work you can get as good or better results out of a smaller/more narrow model and the same applies to LLMs.

The massive models the big companies are putting out there are generally just bad. Even if it can occasionally give you accurate output, for whatever it is you are asking it to do, it uses way more power and resources than reasonable and you could have found what you were looking for with a simple web search.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] quantumcrop@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

Iceraven is my go to Android browser, librewolf on desktop.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›