this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
120 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

82000 readers
2992 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/59925975

Opinion: Careless big-time users are treating FOSS repos like content delivery networks

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] texture@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

ohhhh i misinterpreted the title as meaning hogs like right wing cranks. LOL

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 21 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

a single company might download the same code hundreds of thousands of times in a day, and the next day, and the next

Why would anyone ever need to do this?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 9 hours ago

The explanation is earlier in the quote you just copied. They're using it as a CDN

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Laziness? Why designate storage for a downloaded repository when you can just use the blazing fast company network to make someone else's storage your storage? Systemically it's fucked up, but individually it kinda makes sense.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 19 points 18 hours ago

They don't design a system that does so intentionally. It's equal parts ignorance, automation and cluelessness

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Shitty CI system

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago

Maybe they're building containers every day? Idk. Can't think of how that'd blow up into thousands without some sort of VM or containerization dependency.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 74 points 22 hours ago

Fox, who also oversees Apache Maven, a popular Java build tool, explained that its repository site is at risk of being overwhelmed by constant Git pulls. The team has dug into this and found that 82 percent of the demand comes from less than 1 percent of IPs. Digging deeper, they discovered that many companies are using open source repositories as if they were content delivery networks (CDNs). So, for example, a single company might download the same code hundreds of thousands of times in a day, and the next day, and the next. This is unsustainable.

GitHub added rate limits for unauthenticated users last year

https://github.blog/changelog/2025-05-08-updated-rate-limits-for-unauthenticated-requests/

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 22 hours ago

Making big companies pony up is always good.

[–] Tywele@piefed.social 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Why does this article repeat itself? It reads super weird.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It's the register they've been writing slop articles (sometimes with interesting news in the middle), since before AI was called ML.