this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
285 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

82488 readers
3968 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PDF.

The investigation looked at what content from political parties and politicians is shown to newly created accounts that are interested in parties and politicians from either the left or the right.

It found that the algorithms push content from the far right to the right-leaning and left-leaning accounts and, to a lesser extent, push content from the radical left to left-leaning accounts.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Well, duh. Antisocial media needs ppl to keep consuming to keep consuming to generate ad revenue. Currently far right are the trending clowns, so that's one explanation. Another's that twatter has always been a cesspool, while tiktok just shows whatever's popular among brain-damaged individuals.

Jokes aside, might as well be a demo of the multiple testing problem, so implying that algorithmic feeds in general do this is premature (not that the article does this, so just a note).

P.s, not defending current algorithmic feeds either; I've personally all but cut those out of my life for good, and advocate for using white-box approaches instead, like what's done in reccomend_from_archive that recommends tracks based on AA's spotify scrape data and listening history/playlist exports.

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 22 points 19 hours ago

Anything centralized can and will be used to abuse the population at the behest of the rich and powerful. The open social web is the only answer.

And thank you all for being here.

[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Algorithmic content is arguably the worst thing to come out of the internet.

It has made it much easier for these companies to manipulate what people see and feed into their fears and delusions.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Algorithmic content is not bad per se. It's the algorithms that are specifically designed to create division and hate. The people who design these things know what they're doing and are doing it because the outcomes are that they want to achieve.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

They aren't designed to do that.

They are designed to give people what they want. People want division and hate. It fuels their attention.

In the 1980s the people who had the longest listening times to Howard Stern were the people who claimed to hate him. The outraged fueled their attention such that they could not turn away because they wanted to see if he got more outrageous and offensive.

People are like kids in an candy store when it comes to negative content. They cannot get enough. They get addicted to the intense feelings the outrageous content provides.

Before algos things were random and they had to try really hard to go find that stuff. The algos spoonfed it to them and they lapped it up eagerly. Back when IG was just my friends, I saw one angry rant every few weeks, today it's 20 angry rants and 20 ads, and my friends content about their kid or cat being cute is buried by 50 other posts which I can't get rid of.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

"Those companies running the orphan crushing machines are really evil."

"Nooo, you must understand those orphans want to be crushed! They're just fulfilling a market need!"

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

We have overt fascists literally controlling the internet and people are still spouting complaints about "algorithms". jfc.

Seriously who upvotes this nonsense? This is how we got here.

[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

More than one thing can be bad about the internet at the same time.

Furthermore, the fascists are the one that put the algorithms in place and control them.

It's the same problem.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

the fascists are the one that put the algorithms in place.

Actually no. Every single program is an "algorithm". Sorting by date is an "algorithm".

You're literally crying about something that's ubiquitous. And that's literally how we got here.

Do you really want more state control of "social media"? You want these wonderful fash controlling those dangerous algorithms? smh.

[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I don't want any social media homie

You're barking up the wrong tree

Take a chill pill

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 34 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I do wonder how much of this is just that moderate parties are boring.

[–] Salvia@lemmy.world 28 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I think it's more about rage bait. The far right just happens to have the best rage bait for the moderate majority.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And any resistance to those policies is met with more rage from the right, its a self propelling cycle.

[–] Salvia@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Why isn't class-based rage as popular, then?

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

because everyone thinks they are middle-class, and everyone aspires to be rich.

very few people think improving the conditions of the working class is a worthwhile goal... the goal is to get out of the working class and feel superior to them.

i grew up a white working class town. Everyone in my town played the lottery and complained about immigrants. They did very little to actually try and improve their town lives... they thought doing so was 'gay'. They wanted to send their kids to college, but then complained how college 'corrupted' us all and turned us into homos, especially when we moved away and got good jobs and had better lives.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes. The "temporarilly embarrased billionaire". How could I forget?

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

What's baffling is I meet people my own age, who make like 200K a year who also think this exact same way. They think their life right now is impoverished and they deserve to be a billionaire one day. Half my first dates the past couple of years tell me how 'difficult' their life is because they can't afford first class plane tickets.

It's mind-blowing to me.

[–] Salvia@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Because the right censors that and feeds anti-socialist propaganda to the media so people misunderstand it and don't try to fight it.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago

Good ol' Red Scare propaganda.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Because it's based on reality and doesn't pander quite as much.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Good policy is boring. Good government is boring. A company with moderate growth targets is boring.

Well-informed, articulate, and smart opinions... are boring.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Also the fact that people with moderate views don't tend to watch political content all that much.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yeah "centricism" is just privileged fascism. It's the privilege of being completely ignorant and complacent while people are genocided, concentration camped, etc.

Overt fascism definitely drives more clicks.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Keeping food in the supermarkets and having working infrastructure will definitely generate less ad revenue... I mean "engagement" than threatening to kill all foreigners and LGBT people.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"Moderates" are right-wing, just like liberals.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

But still boring

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US TikTok, and that's the point. Also, we know X is under opposition control. That's no secret.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

So is Tik Tok.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago

Thanks for another article to dislodge friends from The Poison(tm).

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I am so tired of "journalism" that's just shocked Pikachuing about crap that people already know, and HAVE already known, for YEARS.

It's either a total waste of time, or people are so thick and oblivious that they don't know something that's been staring them DIRECTLY In the face for AGES, and I honestly can't decide which explanation is more depressing.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

You need to verify your hypothesis if you want other people to build on it or everything will eventually crumble down like a house of cards.

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 2 points 23 hours ago

I don't know how far my mouth can gape from shock, but who you have known

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

DAE remember all the libs calling for state control of TikTok? Still calling for state control of "social media"?

This is what they gave us.

Liberalism <---> Fascism.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -2 points 17 hours ago

The downvotes are coming from liberals that refuse to acknowledge they directly support fascism