this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
76 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

83600 readers
3974 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 80 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Can they both lose, please?

[–] XLE@piefed.social 24 points 20 hours ago

It's nice that OpenAI is being pulled in the for-profit direction and the non-profit direction at the same time, and is threatened with losing (more) money if it fails to do either.

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 31 points 20 hours ago

Let's hope they both bankrupt the other.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 13 points 17 hours ago

Musk sued Altman and OpenAI in 2024, claiming the artificial intelligence company that he helped start almost a decade earlier “assiduously manipulated” and “deceived” him into donating $38 million, based on promises that the entity would remain a nonprofi

Musk’s attorneys previously said, in a January filing, that their client should receive up to $134 billion in damages

That seems a little disproportionate.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 26 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Musk sued Altman and OpenAI in 2024, claiming the artificial intelligence company that he helped start almost a decade earlier “assiduously manipulated” and “deceived” him into donating $38 million, based on promises that the entity would remain a nonprofit. The two sides have since been embroiled in a public war of words, in addition to their legal battle and budding business rivalry.

Hey! Look! It's projection!

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 23 points 20 hours ago

It's not necessarily projection, it can just be two shitty people accurately describing each other