$375 million
That fine's a slap on the wrist with a kiss on the forehead
this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
153 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
84569 readers
3632 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Right?! Meta's valued at 1.5T... So 0.025%
If someone makes $100k, that's an equivalent of a $25 fine.
I get your point, but those are two different values. The first is total value of the company (which you could probably compare to someone's net worth) while the second is yearly income.
Meta's annual profit is $60.46 billion and revenue is $200 billion.
So, if maths on a sunday morning don't fail me, for a person making 100k yearly, that's a $625 fine more or less. A slap in the wrist and a kiss in the forehead.
No no no, a person having 100k left after expenses. They mentioned profit, not revenue. So a really soft, tiny slap on the wrist, barely noticable.
Right. I don't disagree with you.
So 375 million will still only be a slap on the wrist.
Those changes include adding age verification for New Mexico users, prohibiting end-to-end encryption for users under 18 and capping their use to 90 hours per month, limiting engagement-boosting features like infinite scroll and autoplay, and requiring Meta to detect 99 percent of new child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
Prohibiting end to end encryption for users under 18 years old, meaning without verified goverment id? Were just going full mask off now, are we?
We must protect the children by removing protections from children!
Yes indeed. That's why I'm not excited about these lawsuits
Yeah hate that New Mexico seems to be stupid and tech illiterate about this, meta sucks so when a government fails to punish them in the right way it just gives meta valid ground to stand on in fighting back.
Mask off would mean that you know where they stand. But I can never tell if lemmings are fashy or just idiots. Probably both, I think. They go over the cliff either way.
Thats a rounding error for them
Is there a non-paywalled link? Archive.today doesn't load for me any more.
... Because
A sweeping win for New Mexico could energize Torrez and thousands of other plaintiffs currently pursuing cases against tech companies. Conversely, a limited order could be a significant blow. The outcome won’t directly impact other cases, but it will almost certainly color negotiations over potential settlements