this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
180 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

84603 readers
4148 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

I get why people do this, I feel the pressure mounting at my job too. At some point we gotta draw a line. We're gonna collectively manifest AI into being a fact of life, just like they want us to. Purposely using AI for dumb junk isn't rebellious, its exactly what the AI creators want you to do. They want us all to have one big mass hallucination that this shit is as necessary as they say it is.

Again, purposely using your job's AI for wasteful purposes is NOT rebellious, but in fact purposely plays into a worse future as planned. If you can afford to quit on principle, and your job is forcing AI usage metrics, thats probably a good time to quit on principle.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

Problem is right now the market sucks so you put your head down and keep your job.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 19 minutes ago

Yeah. Market downturn is always when they take the opportunity to make things worse. Resisting the fucking is a big part of what creates a better job market. But I totally understand not everyone is in a position to risk it

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

TBH, I do this at my job too.

I wouldn't use it for actual work most of the time, but I'm happy to ask it questions about history and do follow-up research, or give it scenarios for my D&D campaign and ask for its suggestions.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Telling people "use more ai" was always a profoundly stupid direction. "Ship more stuff faster, use AI if it helps, get paid the same" would be anti-labor but at least sensible.

If selling widgets the customer probably doesn't care if you used a screwdriver or a drill. They just want their widget. Mandating drill usage is stupid.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That capex number in the article is a big part of it. $200 billion spent to generate $1-2 billion a month in revenue is wasteful, and people at the top are feeling the pressure to justify that expense.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

The people who need the line to keep going up rely on other smaller lines to always keep going up.

[–] henfredemars@lemdro.id 24 points 10 hours ago

Reminds me of a job I had where we got scored based on the number of issues closed. Suddenly, every minor typo or style disagreement became its own issue. We’d close hundreds of issues a day wordsmithing on comments.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

At my job they’ve explicitly called out AI Usage and Aptitude as a core requirement for performance. So you are damn right I am juicing numbers up.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

You'll be the first type of human I'd cut off from water and electricity supply if I were in charge of that sort of thing in the future. Sorry. 😢

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I’d cut me off too

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In that case, you're failing to diagnose the problem.

The human causing these problems are not the humans doing actual productive work (+/- AI usage).

The ones you look for are the ones who exercise executive control over the entire organization.

Attacking the working class for using AI as directed is like being angry at two knuckles on someone's right fist because they punched you in the face.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Totally fair, but in another lens if just nobody used it full stop that would help too.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 31 points 11 hours ago

Well that’s what happens when you make it part of your performance review.

[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 40 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Tokenistic usage of a tokenised metric

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Tax the shit out of data centers. Let them pay for the infrastructure they use and all this nonsense goes away.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Usage score? Retarded executive management.

[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 7 points 10 hours ago

i hope the people pushing this bullshit are identified and will have their water and energy tokens reduced accordingly in our post-apocalyptic ecototalitarian future.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

The Great Silicon Valley Token Fire of 2026 continues.

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Next steps? The bosses start using the AI tools to summarize the usage of the emoyees to make sure they are using it for the right things. Then employees start subtly prompt injecting their bosses LLM to give them more favorable usage scores. And the sea boils as the arms race to see who can burn more tokens to make investors happy.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Next steps? AI does the bosses job and operates the AI tools.

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago
[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

They want to find the best tokenist!

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago

It's what I'm doing.