this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
57 points (96.7% liked)

Not The Onion

21657 readers
787 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In its long-awaited artificial intelligence strategy released Thursday, the Carney government said it will “strengthen its privacy laws to ensure that Canadians’ personal information is not used inappropriately, including for surveillance pricing.” Government officials did not give further details or clarify when asked if that will be an outright ban on the practice.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 4 points 16 minutes ago

Oh yeah, that's the problem... All the companies falling over themselves to give out extra discounts to consumers.

“Why is the government stopping us from charging our customers LESS??”

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 3 points 22 minutes ago

I think most of us understand economics well enough to see that there's no difference between a selective discount and a selective price hike.

[–] Steve@communick.news 20 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I think they misunderstand what people are complaining about.
People don't want discounts for one person while another gets overcharged. It's a good thing if it threatens discounts. Everyone wants to pay the same price for the same thing.

Discounts can be annoying even when they're "fair"
It's annoying when something was discounted yesterday, and now you have to pay more. Or when you just bought something last week, but now you could have saved a bunch because it's some arbitrary special day. Temporary discounts of any kind are inherently unfair and manipulative.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

Tip: Some stores, realiizing if you can return a product and re-buy it at the current discounted price, will retroactively price match themselves within the return window.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 26 points 1 hour ago

LOL, OH NOOOOOO. "Let us absolutely rape your wallet, or else..."

[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 7 points 55 minutes ago

Your “discounts” are being subsidized by someone else’s over charges.

What ever happened to charging enough to cover your overhead and have middle class life?

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 41 minutes ago

God they're so transparent.

"But the discounts we want to give our customers!!!"

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

April 26th 1992...

[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 45 minutes ago

It's not a threat, it's protection money

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Kill it with fire.

I have already pre-boycotted digital pricetags in brick and mortar stores. I will just drop all my shit and leave. You will not get my money if you're changing the prices on customers like that.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 1 points 21 minutes ago

If this isn't the most ridiculous thing ever. Surveillance pricing is effectively a price fixing event across all industry. Old America wanted healthy competition to best serve citizens. Me, I thought old America was bad for its citizens.