Technology

If I understand correctly, if we actually said "this model is great, let's put a pin in it", then it could be turned into a dedicated chip that would be much more efficient and perhaps even something that could get embedded in consumer hardware - but then you are just stuck with that model instead of "the next shiny new model" that they keep making.

I feel like there is a future of more targeted AI. At the moment something that does spreadsheets has to carry knowledge of programming and chemistry and lots of languages and this seems very heavy for what ultimately we need. A programming language focussed AT dedicated to Rust or Go or Java could potentially be quite a bit smaller especially if they focussed on algorithm snippet and auto complete smarts. There is definitely a market for smaller more targeted uses than these all encompassing chat bots where the goal is to move the state of the art on for existing algorithms.

There are efforts there. The new Deepseek 4 compresses a lot of its knowledge using something they call engrams. But it's unfortunately still too big for a consumer GPU.

Gemma 4 is small enough to run on your cellphone.

If your GPU has at least 8GB there are a lot of options for self hosting your own local models

It is now. If you want it not to be, go ahead and stop all this modern bullshit happening around me.

You can't yell at people on the ocean that they don't really need boats, and then attack boats. I mean you can, but it's foolish and unproductive.

So much this.

If we take a look at how the current AI behemoths got there, there’s a trail that goes straight from stolen data to proprietary models. They are charging their users for the privilege of using better aggregated public data. I hope that, when they raise prices once again and more and more users are cut off their larger models, people would understand where their place is, according to corpos.

Yeah, that's what I really don't get.

Why would any serious company think it's a great idea to outsource all your intelligence work to a handfull of US companies, making yourself wholely dependant on their goodwill and the goodwill of the US government?

You can run AI without causing environmental problems just like you can drive cars without burning fossil fuels and you can have industrial production without creating pollutants.

All of that just cuts into the profits though.

It's not going to. Saying all AI should stop is like saying "all gunpowder should stop". Would everyone be better off if no one was using it? Maybe. But that's not going to happen at this point, and will give you a strategic disadvantage if you unilaterally disarm.

And to be clear I'm not talking about using AI to write a screenplay or something creative, I mean like using it to write software, to optimize industrial processes etc.

game theory, my friend. You can't stop if there's a chance someone else is building it. The only way to prevent this would be some sort of AI proliferation treaty like we have for nukes but nukes you test by making large explosions which are easy to detect. How are you going to detect some state backed group in a bunker somewhere disconnected from the internet developing a super AI? I'm fully against ai but the cat is already out of the bag.

Not many people can afford to run their own models.