this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
34 points (97.2% liked)

Games

16800 readers
673 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eggyhead@kbin.run 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Because they can’t help telling everyone how games should be made?

…Wait this wasn’t supposed to be a joke, was it?

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I didn't think that actually happened very often, but it doesn't surprise me when it does. To be a good games journalist, you need to understand a lot about makes games and gamers tick. There's a huge overlap in the skills needed to design a successful and fun game, and the other skills can be picked up easily enough, or hired out. At least, "easily enough" if you're really motivated. It's still a lot of time and effort, but it's very rewarding, especially if you've got a good game idea.

When I watch Digital Foundry and they discuss the technical issues of a game, I can't help but think they'd be great as a release manager/director or something for a big AAA game. Not only could they pick up on QA issues, but they'd know enough to say what the cause is and estimate how much work it would be to fix. And more importantly, they know what game reviewers are looking for, so they know what will impress them.

So yeah, it makes a ton of sense. They probably won't be writing code or creating assets, but they'll know when voice acting is good enough, which option to use to help fix performance issues in a given scene, etc. They could even help design games.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -3 points 8 months ago

Because it's the next step in exerting their demands for control?