AbsoluteChicagoDog

joined 1 year ago
[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How is that relevant?

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Extremely drunk people are not in the state of mind to consent

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

To be clear, blocking ads isn't directly denying anyone money. YouTube decides how video creators are paid and they choose to not pay if ads are blocked. You can agree or disagree with that decision, but the user has no role in it.

Personally I think it's shitty that YouTube can just refuse to pay for the content people create for them.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -3 points 2 months ago (7 children)
[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

How to solve it is simple, our tax dollars already pay for the research, the results are public property

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There's nothing requiring people to work 5 days a week, or 40 hours, or 52 weeks a year. If we worked together we could have way better conditions.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 38 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I have a feeling saying anything less than 18 would have gotten the post deleted

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Shut up and drink your verification can

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Removing down votes is a terrible idea. Look what that did to YouTube

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Techno feudalism is the term, look it up

view more: ‹ prev next ›