EfreetSK

joined 2 years ago
[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 127 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

And also how often the movie is completely oblivious to that. For example it's been a while since I saw "Devil wears Prada" but if I remember right, the ending is:

Our main character has an argument with her boyfriend

Goes to a business trip in Paris

Sleeps with random guy

Returns home and makes up with her boyfriend

And the movie ends like nothing happened, she's happy, that's what's important

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

rethinks ability to compete with netflix

Yeah, I canceled my subscription like 2 years ago, loosing my prize of 30% discount in the process (it was a thing since I had HBO GO). I don't know if it's a regional thing but there was just nothing new or interresting there. I remember just constant superheroes and Harry Potter. Went for Netflix and never looked back. So, good luck I guess, hopefully they change

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 111 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you have to ask, then you don't know

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

to perpetuate backwards gender roles

I never even suggested that. Where did you get that from? All I'm saying is, people in power aren't your friends.

Although is it a good thing that me and my wife work like crazy to keep our family going? Is this really what life is about? I'd love to be stay at home dad, yet I can't

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I literally said it's a positive thing, just that motivation of people in power is cynical. Also I didn't mention communism, I meant it in general regardless of regime

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe a bad choice of words on my part, maybe I should write "not because it's right, but because it doubles the workforce"

Although whether "double the workforce" is good or bad, I'd keep that for a discussion, see my other comment for more info: https://lemmy.world/comment/16185467

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sorry for late response and I see the comment is now deleted by a mod but whatever (well we're on .ml after all).

What I was trying to point out, was the "cynical" part of it. That people in power often don't do it because they want to empower women or help people, more often than not it's just that it brings more people into their "meat grinder" - regardless of the regime. In case of capitalism it's obvious but it doesn't need to be money necessarily; in the case of Stalin - pardon me if I don't believe that he did it for "supporting women rights and making the world a better place ✌️", he did it for the raw economic power to compete with US during cold war and so his own country wouldn't collapse because of his stupid actions.

Whether doubling the workforce is a good thing - that I'd keep up for a debate. I deliberately didn't want to say anything in that area, I'm just saying that the motivation of people in power is cynical, not saying if result is good or bad.

But if you'd want my personal stance - I do believe that in order to achieve welfare/prosperity, not all the people have to work. And I do believe that there are more important things in life than working. I'd love to be a stay at home dad, but I can't. Even though my country sort of supports it, my pay would cut dramatically and we as a family wouldn't be able to survive.

But honestly thank you for asking. It's very refreshing to meet a person who asks and tries to understand the motivation of the commenter rather than jumping right to the conclusion (as almost every other response here)

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I see the next BF will be developed by Dice and 4 other teams? Well I wish them luck on good cooperation but that sounds really scary team-wise.

But who knows, maybe it'll help. Because Dice is ... ok well I'm old so I don't know if this is still true but I remember them as one of those studios that just keeps fucking things up. Bugs on bugs. Them and Creative Asembly (Total War). But as I said, I'm old, not sure how things look now

Bonus rant: But boy, I remember one bug they introduced in BF3 with one patch. The bug was that the under-barrel shotgun attachement didn't have its own damage, but took the damage from main weapon i.e. 12 pellets x 25 HP = 300 HP. I mean, shit happens but how much of a mess there's in the code that this happens? I'd genuinely love to see that code. And! And! That testers don't catch it during testing! How? That it flows through all the stages up to the production. Do you even have some tests? Is there a QA team? And I know I'm not crazy because as a follow up, the EA tried to step in to put things in order. Rant over

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

I immediately took a look at the date. When I saw 2021, I said "Of course"

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

'CAUSE IT HAS A VALID POINT TO MAKE, IT'S INSISTED!

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Heh, is that Marian Labuda in the picture from movie 'Vesničko má středisková'?

 

I mean seriously, me and my brother are watching it right now on RTVS (Slovak National Television) and we realised that the story arc was never finished, Fantomas was never caught. In the spirit of remakes and reboots it's time I'd say

957
Numa (lemmy.world)
 
 
 
view more: next ›