antlion

joined 1 year ago
[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 weeks ago (19 children)

Insects, crustaceans, and mollusks do not have any form of consciousness. They are just as aware and alive as fungi and plants. Otherwise we would feel great remorse when examining all the slaughtered insects on the front of our motor vehicles. Fish, are slightly more aware, but I don’t attach much emotional weight to their very tiny brains. Birds and mammals are on a higher level of consciousness than a lot of the animal kingdom. But not all death is painful. Many humans seek a dignified and painless death.

Domesticated animals for the most part have the ability to escape, if they wanted to express their consciousness and free will. The process of domestication is an evolutionary choice. Chickens and other livestock are suffering today because their ancestors gave away their freedom for security.

Actually I think dogs collectively suffer more than most of our livestock. For them, death is out of reach. Their suffering is prolonged. Their mutations and genetic deficiencies are cruel. Many dogs are born with such horrible genes and behaviors they have no hope of a quality life with humans. Very sad.

Anyway, there is no objective truth on this matter. But I know you care so much about suffering, I just want to reassure you, that I feel no sorrow for livestock. Everything we eat and purchase impacts the animals on this planet. To exist is to impose suffering on the Earth. And I’m okay with that. My opinion, is that vegans are drawing a line in sand so feint that it is erased by the slightest breeze.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 weeks ago (26 children)

There’s no projection. I feel no guilt for eating the diet of every single one of my ancestors. Zero. I do not believe animals to be sentient, and I do not equate death or servitude with suffering. It’s not that I don’t understand vegans. I do. But it’s like a religion - you have a fundamental belief, not in god, but in the consciousness of animals. Because we differ on that fundamental belief, we can reach no understanding about the ethics beyond that.

And I think it is a fair comparison. People who pay for media may also see it as an ethical baseline to pay for what you consume. And in both the case of vegans, and those who pay for streaming, the perceived benefit of that choice is in my opinion fundamentally flawed. But it’s really not a big deal to me. I was just trying to answer OPs question. I think your response only validates my analogy. Thank you.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 weeks ago (46 children)

It’s because they are paying money for something and you’re getting a better deal. See that’s not fair. Same reason vegans hate on omnivores - they’ve taken the high road and the benefits are small while the cost is high. They tell themselves that their money is going to the artists. And if you believe that, then piracy is harming artists in a very direct way.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Often imitated but never duplicated.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s simply a service problem. NFL offers great streaming for those abroad because they don’t have exclusive deals with networks. If you want to watch NFL you need numerous subscriptions, and hope you don’t live in the wrong area.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Seasons 1-7 appear on Tubi. Pretty easy to rip with yt-dlp

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

The article gave me the opposite impression. Basically their database contains lawn signs and bumper stickers on accident - they save all images where text is found but they keep it just in case it had a license plate (because they aren’t sure what is or isn’t a license plate). These kinds of databases are so massive there’s little to no human eyes on images. Anyway I don’t think it would be very hard to send garbage into their database.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Readers are not smart. They are trained on data with license plates, and I doubt their training had license plates with extra characters on both sides.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

It varies by state and there are no laws that say it needs to be machine readable. It only needs to be human readable.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (14 children)

I’m looking for some adversarial material - numbers and letters at various angles that I can stick to the left and right of my license plate. To a human it will be obvious which part is my license plate but it might be sufficient to confuse an ALPR algorithm.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Hope he can make it to at least a million steps to bring down his per step cost below 10 cents.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

371k steps over 10 years is like 100 steps per day. Is it really slow, or did he only use it once a week?

view more: ‹ prev next ›