b_n

joined 2 years ago
[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Piling on another comment to say that lurking here feels much nicer than on reddit. The comments are actually worth reading a lot of the time. RiF going down was a dark day, but Jerboa and Lemmy make everything light.

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 60 points 4 months ago

Patents. Its always patents.

There is probably some IP there that can make printers worse for consumers too.

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

The modern interpretation, sure.

And agreed, "random, you might like this" is not as random as "here is a page on red food colouring"

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

That's why I said seeded. Seeded from noise. The random number generator (function) is still an algorithm..

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

In comsci, there are no real random numbers. They are all seeded psuedo-random number algorithms. (Unless you integrate with some third party random as a service setup)

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Dont worry, lemmings worry about some shutdown every other week. Been here since the API closures, and its quite nice (if you block the news communities)

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Yo, are you okay?

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

But if it was a 20 year old man with a 15 year old girl, would you still not mind?

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

ROI from adverts is always a shitshow though. If you come off a plane and see and buy it, is it because you just saw an advert for it, or were you always going to buy it. There is of course stats that may show number of impressions vs. total purchases trend, but its still just massive correlation that I imagine there is a bunch of people pulling spreadsheets together to justify their marketing spend. Anecdotally, I've heard of data teams working with marketing teams and just going "whelp, whatever you need to justify your job", etc.

Real ROI via direct sales though, that's somewhat measurable since you have a direct cost of acquisition (sales person salary, overheads, etc) vs revenue.

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I always wondered this too.

Found a website saying Youtube adviews are $100-300 per 10k (ad views, not video views). That's 1-3¢ per view. If we assume an ad is 10seconds, then your time is worth 0.1-0.3¢ per second, or $3.60-10.80 per hour.

An A380 looks to be 380-615 seats. I'd imagine they're more often optimising for space, so let's say 550.

Long haul flight, 10% of people at any time using inflight stuff, 8 hours, 4 ads per hour = 5500.18*4 ads watched. 1760 ads. There will be a massive premium for planes, but surely only one order of magnitude more (e.g. 10x). That's equivalent to give or take 20k YouTube adviews which would be $200-600 per flight.

There are a lot of planes in the sky every single day though....

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I thoroughly agree. Which is why we need governments and regulation IMO. Consumers are working in a vacuum of knowledge, businesses are not incentivised to give said knowledge.

[–] b_n@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just because something is expensive doesn't always mean that the standard of living of those making the product is any better. Nike sweat shops for example.

Consumers dont have a lot of transparent choices here. Governments have roles in regulating and making the true cost of products more transparent. I'd say businesses have that responsibility, but clearly that doesn't work, otherwise we wouldn't be here etc. Businesses dont want people feeling guilty when they buy their product, so why would they tell people.

For a business to be competitive in a harm free supply chain, then the playing field needs to be levelled. Transparent supply chains everywhere, make everyone feel guilty all the time, maybe something would change.

view more: next ›