baronvonj

joined 8 months ago
[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Coming" Feb. 25 2026. 😉

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Gentoo is still around‽ But Arch exists and eMachines was discontinued like 10 years ago!

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

I did not, in fact, say. But they did say that, yes.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can self-host Bitwarden. Or there's the Vaultwarden implementation of the Bitwarden API.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 33 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Things like this need to be prosecuted as negligent manslaughter.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Can't really categorically say one way is best or worst. Depends on the individual arena (location relative to you and transportation options, suitability of the arena to the sport, concession prices, concession quality, weather if the arena is open), the teams playing, the personality of the other fans near you, your own personality. It's all good.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Everything I've said is everybody is categorize as a teen unless the provide face/ID verification. So anonymous should still be allowed in general, just not to servers/channels set as age restricted.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago

More than he can count to

at least not without taking his shoes off.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 42 points 3 weeks ago

good managers don't care.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

I will say, not too long ago there was some question if I had setup a WhatsApp account with my number due to some emails I was receiving. Not wanting to install the app and unwittingly create an account just by checking if I had one, my wife created a group chat with just her and my number, sent a message, and then we saw it get marked as read by all. Which in an E2EE system should not have been possible without me having the app setup. so I did go ahead and wiped an old and setup the app to make sure I was in control of any account for my number, and I did then receive that group chat. But still, very sketchy.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

An e2ee group chat would need every member to have every other member's public key. So for 5 people, your client would sign with your private key and send 4 unique messages encrypted each with 1 other person's public key. Each of them would decrypt their copy of the message with their private key and verify the signature with your public key. So I think what arcterus was saying was that employee who requests access to a user's messages then becomes just another member of a group chat, but the UI just doesn't show it as such. Every message you send is then secretly encrypted, on your client, with their special public key and sent to them to be decrypted. That would still be E2EE.

view more: ‹ prev next ›