vrighter

joined 1 year ago
[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

as a dev, seeing you conflate "async" with "multithreaded" is painful.

And what you're saying is just not true anyway.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

ah, if only it were that simple. One can dream. The cpu is just one component in the system

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

imagine someone with a short term memory loss condition, who had had one philosophy class prior to the accident that caused their condition. They'd endlessly repeat the same idealistic message over and over, because they keep forgetting that they have already just told you. Sometimes with different words, but sometimes not.

That

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you're talking about bugs, not backdoors. A backdoor is something intentional

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

yes, if i combare kicad with blender, neither is broken because they have different features. But also, nobody is telling users that kicad's days are over and it should be replaced by blender. If they did, and a user wanted to design a circuit board, the user is out of luck. The user is told that it is a replacement. From the user's point of view it most definitely is not.

The probeem isn't just that wayland doesn't do everything x does. But that users are told that it will replace x, deal with it and quit complaining.

We have to keep in mind that the fact that we know what wayland is in the first place puts us squarely into the "technical user" category, not regular users. Regular users are the ones who don't even know (nor should they have to care) what wayland even is

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"that thing you used to do is now impossible to do consistently across different implementations, if at all. But it's all ok, because we have decided it's not our responsibility!"

That is not what users want to hear. From a user's point of view, it is broken.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 11 months ago (12 children)

but why? you'll still measure things in football fields, elephants or "large boulders" so it won't affect you much

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"the next generation cloud-native"

that's as far as I got. Cloud native is an immediate, non-negotiable red flag for me

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

needs more jpeg

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As more people post ai generated content online, then future ai will inevitably be trained on ai generated stuff and basically implode (inbreeding kind of thing).

At least that's what I'm hoping for

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

wouldn't /64 still leave you with 64 bits for you to do whatever? Ipv6 has a 128 bit address. If you can do subnets with a small usable portion of 32 bits, then you certainly can with a full 64 bits

view more: ‹ prev next ›