this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
321 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3143 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This has to be the idea of the century

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

NT was a fully seperate product from 95 and 98, using a different kernel. 95 -> 98 -> Me was the old kernel, NT -> 2000 -> XP -> Vista -> 7 -> 8 -> 10 -> 11 is the other line. Me was a play on Millenium Edition, so that line was just numbered by year. The NT series names are a bit wonky, though. The reason for skipping 9 involves legacy program support and bad coding practices from ye olde programmers. 7 was kind of an arbitrary number to begin with, though.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

7 was the version if you only counted the "best ofs" Windows 3, 95, XP, Vista, 7.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I understand the whole different kernal thing but that's the type of thing that the average consumer shouldn't have to know to follow your program naming scheme.

[–] clif@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I just enjoy that I can call them "xbone"

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

In addition to ME and NT, they also had CE.

CEMENT.