this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
338 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

61203 readers
5621 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 274 points 1 week ago (5 children)

No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 126 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel's scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this is the company that at one time chose to buy mcafee.

[–] alsu2launda@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

McAfee was a solid product in the beginning, it turned to crap after it's admittedly crazy founder sold it off.

[–] Kvoth@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, dude is straight bat shit, but he made a good product. Buying McAfee wasn't the mistake, ruining it was

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd bet money McAfee has destroy more registries then it has protected.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Who gave him access to regex.exe?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What? It worked out for Twitter shareholders though.

What bothers me about all these political posts is when people act surprised when profit seeking people act purely in their self interest.

I agree it’s bad, but it’s weird to be constantly mad about things so obvious like parasites acting parasitically.

Responsibility, shockingly, can refer to more than making money.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought the weenis was a dance?

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can lick my own weenis.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Ultimately, the board doesn't control who can buy stock.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Responsible to who?
Of course they will sell if there's a profit to be made. Companies exist to make profits, if they can make a profit from it, it's actually their responsibility to the shareholders to do it.

Maybe you mean responsible in some way that has to do with morals, but if you think morals apart from staying within the law, have any say in this whatsoever, you are being very naive. That's not at all how the system works.

That said I don't see any other way than corruption for Musk to be interested. Musk buys Intel, and Trump doubles the subsidies to Intel and give them extra sweet government contracts. And everybody profit, except the stupid taxpayers including those that voted Trump.

Only the law helps super capitalist narcissists to stay at least somewhat within moral norms.
And in USA the law doesn't even count anymore. So there you go, everything is fucked up, until Americans figure it out. Which means it will be fucked up for a loooong time.