this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
446 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
3843 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Check it, yo. In the 90s all the articles and rumors around quantum computing were exactly the same. Exactly.

Whenever I hear about some new quantum computing breakthrough, I spend about five seconds wondering if it's real and then I feel very nostalgic because no, it never is.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Quantum computer do exist. And have existed for some time now. Breakthroughs have been achieved several times.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, sure and it’s interesting stuff. But not anywhere near useful in the sense people mean when they talk about computers.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 hours ago

They are as useful as the Large Hadron Collider, or the New Horizons probe.

They are instruments of practical scientific research. They may have some return in useful technology or not, but science is always worth it.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except quantum computers do indeed exist right now, and did not in the 90's. Sadly, the hype and corporate interests still make it difficult to tell truth from nonsense.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, sure they exist. Much like the ENIAC. And it’s cool stuff to work with. It’s just not anywhere close to practical. And it never has been.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just assume it's in a superposition of both being real and not real at the same time.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you had asked someone in the 90s if they could imagine half the shit that we have technologically they wouldn’t believe it. Just because something seems surreal, doesn’t mean it’s fake.

Whether this new chip can do the things it claims we’ll see soon enough.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, I was a kid in the 90s and I feel like we’re behind what I expected in most respects.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

The ideas have always been there, it's just a bottle neck on cheap electronics and people figuring out the foundation technology. I can't think of to many tech advancements that have surprised me; that's not too say they aren't impressive, but just about anything we can imagine is possible.

The main thing I don't expect to see is useful and reliable brain/electronics interfaces. I think biology is too unique for an of the shelf product to be possible, which means it's too hard to make a profitable product.