this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
1016 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

73423 readers
4389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 357 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Just to fast-forward this dumb cat-and-mouse thing, the next step is people go back to torrenting their porn and deeper down the rabbit hole of garbage "free" websites skirting the rules.

As always, the UK is useful on the international stage because sometimes you need to be able to point at some idiot trying dumb stuff to explain to people why dumb stuff is dumb.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 108 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It does feel that way. UK bureaucracy is just one giant guinea pig stunting it's own commonwealth.

Next someone will try enforcing paper umbrellas as a solution for climate action. We'll all say, "That won't work". They'll still do it; it won't work. We'll say, "We told you so", and it won't get reversed because they're already aiming at the next foot to shoot.

[–] Bubbey@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

UK Bureaucracy is just one giant guinea pig

He tries his best...

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

There has to be a logical next step for the information age. Old school government is not fucking working, and we can all see it.

The fact that there aren't large scale riots already is astounding.

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

100% Brexit quickly shut up similar movements when people saw how badly it went

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now if only Trumpism would have shut down extremist right wing idiology globally.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Trumpism is still in progress, maybe...

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It should have died when he tried to coup the US government after he lost the 2020 election.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Alberta seems to have missed that memo.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Damn Alberta; always trying to leave the EU.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I’m uninformed. What’s the reason for the porn ID thing? Is it just porn or more?

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

You know the old saying... The politicians don't want children to be able to recognize a cunt.

[–] lath@piefed.social 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Surveillance due to paranoia due to all the shady shit they're doing.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Neoliberal political class implementing fascist surveillance capitalism laws — masquerading as child protection — because they are owned by a fascist oligarchy.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago

It's never about the children, it's an excuse for surveillance capitalism.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

If data is collected that can be used for blackmail, it will eventially be used for that purpose.

[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Christian evangelists at the root of it all. 'nuff said.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago

Must protect the children

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

It's probably true that a few anti-porn people exist somewhere in the world. It's certainly true that fascists love adding in new tools to keep the general population from using the internet freely.

So the answer to your question is yes, and yes.

It also general censorship they are applying it to some political content as well.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then, we move to the socks proxy, or tor, or other options I haven’t even considered yet.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I am pretty sure they would consider tor as using a VPN.

Probably they would demand ISPs to run lists of known VPN addresses and if you connect to them, they will forward the information to the anti-terrorism unit and you will get SWATed.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If Russia, China, and Iran cannot stop tor usage, there's no way the UK can do it.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

I believe China can stop any kind of access at any time, they just choose to allow a certain percentage of folks to get through above a certain bar of sophistication and need.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Don't the people in those countries use a proxy to access tor first? probably that means cycling through the proxies regularly as they become known. I have no doubt that it is impossible to prevent truly tech savvy people from access. Also Russia, Iran and China all run state sanctioned hackers, so the governments have a vested interest in allowing these groups to obscure where they are coming from.

But i am not sure how much that transpires to a broader public.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

That's what things like snowflake and bridges are for. Because, at least with snowflake, it just looks like a webRTC phone call. But it's actually tor traffic. And snowflake proxies are ephemeral, since you can just run them in your browser and help anyone connect.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Their next strategy will be to keep a list of websites that are “government approved”, I'm afraid. Long live the Great UK Firewall!!