this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
173 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

74865 readers
2862 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

don't stream, download your porn from usenet like a civilised person

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

You could but you know there is nsfw content right here on Lemmy

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In my day the popular kids would share it over bluetooth.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Bluetooth? I got mine from a dial-up BBS via a 1200 baud modem.

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i get how usenet is better than streaming from a popup filled website, but i fail to see how it is better than torrenting
qbittorrent has built-in search as well

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Popups? In 2025?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You don’t understand the difference between Usenet and torrents.

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

i haven't used it, only read some available documentation, but it seems like a subscription service to access a server with stuff of dubious legality on it, but please correct me if i'm wrong. i kinda want to get into it but, as i was saying, i fail to see how it is better than torrenting

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

It’s better because it basically has everything that torrent sites have, since the same groups upload everything to both, but it’s all done over SSL encrypted connections so your ISP can’t see what you’re downloading, so you don’t need a VPN and you are downloading directly from servers so it’s much faster and you don’t have to worry about the number of seeders, nor do you have to seed yourself. You have many different providers you can sign up to, and many different indexers to help find what you are looking for. It also can download parts of the same content from different sources and combine them to make a whole.

Once you’ve tried it, torrenting feels so amateur and insecure and outdated. Ideally you just set up both, which is what I have done with qbittorrent running in a docker container with a built in VPN, but the torrents are the “last resort” when the content I want can’t be found on Usenet - which is very rarely.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 13 hours ago

Doesn't this also mean that the server can be a single point of failure? Whereas in a torrent swarm it's distributed and more resilient?

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it'd be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs.

And no, torrenting isn't outdated and isn't amateur. In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear.

Some kind of Usenet with global identifiers of messages and posters, and with something like Kademlia to find sources for a specific newsgroup(to get all the other side has in it)/post(to get it specifically)/person(their public key), would be much better than just replicating each message everywhere with a local identifier.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett.

I haven't touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin', then it transfers the complete files to another folder.

But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself?

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

empornium FTW!