this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
676 points (90.1% liked)

Fediverse

36963 readers
911 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago (47 children)

I've always wondered why conservatives insist on coming to the fediverse when conventional networks are more appealing to them and their ideals nowadays. Or is that still not enough?

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 137 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ideals don’t matter to them, what matters is spreading their propaganda far and wide.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 73 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bingo. These are the same people who will say that most political violence comes from the left while removing a study showing the opposite: a study about a statistical trend that has been well known and documented for longer than I've been alive.

They don't care. Their beliefs shape shift to fit whatever is most expedient in the moment. They will openly lie to your face, without even trying to hide that it's a lie while they smile and say they're being honest. The people who gaslit the nation about project 2025 only to have cabinet members gleeposting about implementing it on social media.

Truth is irrelevant and reality is an inconvenience. Hypocrisy is as dead to them as the corpse of civility they prop up whenever it suits their narrative.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

They lie because they believe they'll be part of the "in-group", while in reality, they are going to be censored the moment their higher-up has the ability to turn on them without retribution.

They are fools, but not to be underestimated.

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago

A lot if it is sowing dissent and breaking discourse as well.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (6 children)

When I was a conservative piece of shit, in my younger days, I had the most outlandish bumper stickers you can imagine. Probably more outlandish than you can imagine, actually, 99.9% likelihood. There were quite a few. I knew I was being an ass and I loved when it offended people, because I was miserable. Someone was paying attention to me. I was getting a reaction. I existed! Anyway, yeah, it can be as simple as "they get off on ruining your day cuz they're miserable pieces of shit." Speaking from experience.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

"They turned potoooooooo into a conservative!"

Potoooooooo: "...i got better."

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good job being less of a piece of shit and congrats on the happiness. Any advice for helping people out of there?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Tl;dr version:

Take mushrooms in Amsterdam, say "it's not doing anything" and also take your sister-in-law's portion (turns out everyone is going to bed so you're on your own for this first psilocybin trip, which should make it easier to...)

Cry for five to six hours, finally lose religion and 80-90 pounds (over next 6-12 months), get medicated for ADHD (not currently, but sure helps), continue occasionally microdosing and/or smoking pot until everything finishes clicking.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Ok so I've got to make like the CIA and put lsd in fhe water supply? Got it. /s obviously

Funny though as me and a friend found religion through acid, though we stayed progressive. I do really wish more people would go trip in pursuit of better understanding of shared humanity

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Now that was a wild ride to read

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

You should've been on the ride! It was indeed something.

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing. I'm glad you are feeling less miserable now.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks. Take lots of psychedelics, everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

they want attention, which is why magat are so desperate for trump to recognize them.

[–] treyf711@eviltoast.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People can change. Even if that baby thinks they can’t.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Even if that baby thinks they can’t.

I worry you're right.

That video is like a weirdly nostalgic confessional of my time in D.C. I was a huge piece of shit. Systematic theology book. Capitol Hill job. Little bitty bow ties. Speakeasies. Pork stuffed potatoes at Dixie Bones. People can change.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same reason why tankies don't just move to China, or why some Canadians had Trump bumperstickers: the point is to take over and wield authority as a weapon. Of course they try to invade and pollute every space they can and muddy waters wherever possible.

[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

And they've been incredibly successful in doing so.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They need an audience to perform for. When ever you see a social media "safe space" for conservatives (Voat, Truth Social, etc.) they almost always wither and die. They need people to blame for being everything wrong with the world as well as react to their terrible takes, otherwise there's no point in shouting their outrage and anger on the internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

They're insecure, hateful little twats, and the only comfort they feel is to spread their hateful insecurity around.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They go everywhere because even if a bunch of people are like “fuck off nazis” there will be a few people that are like “oh hey you have some good ideas”.

That’s why they’ve been recruiting online since the beginning of the internet. Capture whoever you can that’s sympathetic and keep bolstering numbers by any means necessary. Worked out pretty well for them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Free platforms like the Fediverse would actually suit conservative ideals of freedom quite well.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they cared about ideals, that is.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Since when do conservatives follow conservative ideals of freedom?

That's a reason why it won't work - see Reddit's r/Conservative which lists every post as "approved speech only" aka "flaired users only".

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

and the mods are associated with Russia too, not surprising why its the most repressive sub,(after the others got banned years ago)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 13 points 1 day ago

If those were the ideals, the Kimmel and Colbert firings never would’ve happened.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

They don't want their own spaces as much as making other people's spaces are theirs too - aka "This is why we can't have nice things"

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If they get defederated, they just spin up a new instance and keep spreading their hate.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Because this place isn't censored for their side, they're trying to break it.

[–] wizblizz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Ideals? You mean diet fascism?

load more comments (36 replies)