this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
163 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

76041 readers
2647 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago (10 children)

For those of you cheering for the AI bubble to pop...

AI investments now accounts for about 40% of the United States’ GDP growth in 2025, and AI companies are responsible for 80% of growth in American stocks.

...are you not scared shitless?

This is not the dotcom bust, and it's far fucking worse than the 2008 housing crisis. And to think when I was young the Savings and Loan crisis was a big deal. We're on the edge of Great Depression 2.0.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

I think you should only be scared if you own AI stocks and I would guess not a whole lot of common people can even afford to invest in stock. Let those rich idiots lose their money. Maybe they will learn a lesson

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

The best thing about this shit show is el spastico's trade war having readied other countries for hard times and pushed them to diversify and make new trade deals. The US deserves its suffering completely, and now they will drag the world down less when they shit the bed.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 7 hours ago

Are you not scared shitless?

No.

I'm too fucking stupid.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It would be interesting to know how many resources this growth has taken from others places...

As for now it don't seems that AI has generated a profit for the companies that bring it to the market and it seems it will not do it even in the near future, so I assume the question is: how many years can your economy be sustained by a sector that is not generating any revenue and is absorbing a monstrous amount of resources ?

We are not talking about a single company (like Amazon back at the time), do you really think that even when Ai will start (if ever) to generate profits these will be able to repay all the investements done today ?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 39 minutes ago

do you really think that even when Ai will start (if ever) to generate profits these will be able to repay all the investements done today

First, actual investments that have been done are relatively modest. It's still a substantial portion of TSMC fab capacity. All of the deal announcements for datacenters are 50x-100x growth. I doubt all of this capacity will be built for a long time. Coding/reasoning models can have more demand, but openAI (most of the deal announcements) is not that good at those. 100x power growth is also 200x every 2 years token output growth, and if models get better, users need less tokens by getting it right on fewer tries.

Second, they are losing money at current levels. Oracle leaked it lost $100m on existing AI datacenter operating losses. Coreweave is fully levered at 10% interest rates. Everyone is operating like social media startups from 10-20 years ago. Only revenue growth and market share, and being cool, matters. Enshittification will come much later.

Third, datacenters are fundamentally flawed, and local AI has competitive advantage to them. AI is good at datamining the datacenter traffic for output that could be profitable to steal.

Fourth, the only business model is US military and disinformation control. They will pay infinitity, and support infinity investment. Giant datacenters are about Skynet. Not market profits. That US government would protect their oligarch partners in stealing your ideas/llm outputs, and amplify current media's messaging that anti-genocide views are treasonous anti-American sentiment.

how many resources this growth has taken from others places…

If all the money goes towards skynet, energy bills for everyone else will go up, including what little manufacturers there are in US. Insisting on war on China and Russia is helped by forced unemployment, and fascist response to the unemployed's uppityness. Datacenter AI's primary certain value is as a new cold war Arms and disinformation race.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

FWIW, part of the OpenAI investment process is signing something to say that you understand that you’re unlikely to get any return on your investment and that you consider it more akin to a donation

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I would think that this warning, in a way or another, is true in every kind of investment, even my bank's personal investment have something like it.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Not framed like that. You have to acknowledge that investments can depreciate rather than appreciate and that you may lose your money, sure. That’s very different to saying that you acknowledge that you probably will lose your money and that you consider your investment a donation.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think that this is just a technical difference based on what you are investing into.
A personal bank's investement is a different thing than a investement in a startup, with different level of risks and revenue.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

VCs typically want a return on their investments

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 39 seconds ago

With a bank investement I get something back, even if less than what I invested. Could OpenAI pay back even half of what received ?

Which send us back to the starting point: what will happen when the VCs will start to ask for their money back or for their share of the revenue ? Inevitably the bubble will pop.

[–] noughtnaut@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Serious question: what if I am, and have no idea how to prep for it?

My pension and other things are tied up in stocks and such, if there's a crash coming I'd think cash under the pillow would be better than stocks. But how do you do that, with your pension?

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I moved the majority of my 401k allocations to international markets and have stopped contributing more than the match minimum. I've lost on some serious short term gains but I'm not risking holding the bag with my kid's future.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

...are you not scared shitless?

the longer the bubble keeps going, the worse it will be... those of us convinced this is already a massive bubble believe the best time for it to pop was yesterday, the next best time is right now

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Yea, the best thing for bubbles is to pop early and often before they start snowballing. These companies have negative net revenue and are burning billions. The tech is neat, but I don't think text generators are going to completely revolutionize industries the way the industry is presenting them. NVIDIA giving OpenAI money to give to Oracle to give back to NVIDIA just screams house of cards.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Just like the real estate market!

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What? For my third once-in-a-lifetime economic crisis? There's no way this isn't going to suck. We're all doomed no matter what.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

You have no clue what "doomed" means if you think what's coming compares to anything since the Great Depression and WWII.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The current leadership in the US is, uh, less than equipped to handle day to day functions, let alone a real crisis. It will be quite bad.

There weren't any nuclear weapons on earth in 1930.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

I personally prefer to rip off the band aid than let it stink and get it infected. I'm scared for the time remaining before the pop. This shit is intolerable. Let it "pop". Let it burn.

[–] hotdogcharmer@lemmy.zip 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We're fucked. No point being scared of something we have no control over. A few rich men will come out of this ahead, and the rest of us will fight over the scraps, lose our homes, and starve. 🤷‍♂️

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You have control, you just refuse to risk your lifestyle by exercising it.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no, we won’t be able to afford houses or rent or save for retirement or- hang on just a second…

Wait, we already can’t do those things, and the last thing I want to do is, once again, validate the existence of people I would prefer to see in little pieces scattered all over the street for all the pain and suffering they’ve caused just to get a little more money on top of their billions.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Guessing you have no idea what the Great Depression was like. My parents grew up in it.

Great Depression: 30% unemployment

2008 crisis: 4.2% economic contraction

If you think modern America is bad now, boy oh boy, you're about to get an education on how bad it can really get.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Ok? And this is relevant how? I’m Canadian, so pretty tied to the US’s bullshit at the moment, but damn where’s this US bravery I keep hearing so much about?

Deflection isn’t going to solve your problems.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You are right, but you are comparing apples with oranges here, what was the Great Depression economy contraction ? Or what was the unemployment rates in 2008 ?

[–] druidjaidan@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Unemployment around the 2008 crisis peaked around 10%.

You're delusional if you think the 2008 recession remotely compares to the impact of the great depression. You just have 0 frame of reference to compare. I say that as part of the most impacted group: I was just getting out of college when that crashed and it killed my job opportunities.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 7 hours ago

I don't think it, I was only pointing out that he was comparing two different things.

I know that there is no way the two events have a compatible frame of reference but that does not means that you can compare the two values.