this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
764 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

81451 readers
4451 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ring’s controversial, AI-powered “Search Party” feature isn’t intended to always be limited only to dogs, the company’s founder, Jamie Siminoff, told Ring employees in an internal email obtained by 404 Media.

In October, Ring launched Search Party, an on-by-default feature that links together Ring cameras in a neighborhood and uses AI to search for specific lost dogs, essentially creating a networked, automated surveillance system. The feature got some attention at the time, but faced extreme backlash after Ring and Siminoff promoted Search Party during a Super Bowl ad. 404 Media obtained an email that Siminoff sent to all Ring employees in early October, soon after the feature’s launch, which said the feature was introduced “first for finding dogs,” but that it or features like it would be expanded to “zero out crime in neighborhoods.”

“This is by far the most innovation that we have launched in the history of Ring. And it is not only the quantity, but quality,” Siminoff wrote. “I believe that the foundation we created with Search Party, first for finding dogs, will end up becoming one of the most important pieces of tech and innovation to truly unlock the impact of our mission. You can now see a future where we are able to zero out crime in neighborhoods. So many things to do to get there but for the first time ever we have the chance to fully complete what we started.”

Archive: http://archive.today/xKxOd

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 71 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It shows you how insular these people must be. That ad was the result of meeting after meeting, plan after plan. They had convinced themselves that the public would eat it up. We would be like "Holy shit that's amazing, let's give you ALL our data and video and privacy!". They actually thought we would go for it. lol.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 72 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

To be fair, I'm actually pleasantly surprised that people didn't go for it.

It's not like majority of people seemed to give a shit about privacy not too long ago...

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 31 points 21 hours ago

Same.

I was sure the emotional manipulation tactic would be extremely effective. Guess it was a little too blatant, even for the general public.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

My 12 year old was sold on the idea. But she's 12 and may love dogs more than people.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm in my 30s and I like most dogs more than most people.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, 99% of dogs beat 99.99999% of people. And 99% of cats do the same.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I'm with you on dogs.

But i'd never trust a cat... They know why.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 6 points 18 hours ago

They are megalomaniacs, the owners and ceo's that were chosen by those owners' and their board members. They surround themselves with yes men, anyone telling them they are wrong will be removed from their lives, as they fashion themselves after the president and other leaders above them that do the same.