this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
542 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

85422 readers
3833 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 171 points 2 months ago (7 children)

These systems are able to navigate complex landscapes on their own, alert authorities about security threats, and can provide around-the-clock video surveillance.

If only there was a cheaper way to provide around-the-clock video surveillance. Alas, we don't have the technology.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 101 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Even if you needed something mobile, it's not like datacenters are exactly complex landscapes.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 115 points 2 months ago (4 children)

They don't need something mobile. They can stick 1000 cameras up for the cost of one of these and have less up keep.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 53 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was thinking the same thing. For surveillance, can't they just use the iconic Camera on Wall. Or if they want to get really advanced with the surrounding premises: Camera on Pole.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Camera on pole can't "remove" problems as quickly

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think these can either, they don't list attack or defensive capabilities on the feature list that I saw, I assume this is just an over glorified video camera that can follow the intruder around.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Maybe not factory. But if Michael Reeves can teach one how to piss beer, I'm sure there's options on the market.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

You don't need a robot dog to have a gun. If you really wanted to have a wall mounted camera with a gun on it, it would be just as easy.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And use AI to actually monitor the thousand cameras. Ask me how I know.

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The AI company I work for recently rolled it out. It works. We are getting alerts when we block the view of a monitored object or an unfamiliar face is in a secure location. Many thousands of cameras are monitored with minimal human oversight.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

With enough kinetic energy, anything's mobile.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

And no recharging time.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're getting all these dystopian nightmare ideas from video games and scifi. People have proven you can sneak past these things inside of a cardboard box.

They are BEGGING for some metal gear carnage.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wonder how many robot duds will be stolen per year? Lots of neat parts in them if you know some electronics.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Someone will be posting about a factory reset button within a year.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

If AI is in charge just ask them to write a time zone calculator in python or whatever.

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The elites don't want you to know this but the robot dogs patrolling data centers are free. You can take them home.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

If your datacenter is mobile, you've really fucked up!

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

A camera on a roomba.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 18 points 2 months ago

You know the video part is training data for autonomous weapons right? Like sure if all you want to do is video surveillance this is overkill, but maybe this is about more than surveillance?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Data centers and wasting massive amounts of resources. Name a more iconic duo.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

billionaires and every crime in the book.

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago

oh they'll figure it out real quick when these bots get pwned and become malware vectors against the data centers they're 'protecting'

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I still don't understand them not just making a tribe of loved equals for a bunker. Power rots the mind and soul

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Any good articles on how to permanently seal those bunkers?

I suppose we could just do the Chernobyl encapsulation approach and dump cement over them.

[–] bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It's almost like they need something mobile they can add weaponry to that could chase and hunt down security threats...

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

1500 camera alternative (motion detection monitoring) seems reasonable enough. The black mirror machine gun turret is needed for marketing/mission improvement.