this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
112 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

84796 readers
3607 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1135683/x-announces-significant-restrictions-to-free-accounts-50-posts-and-200-replies-per-day

  • Direct Messages (daily): The limit is 500 messages sent per day.
  • Posts: 50 original posts and 200 replies per day for unverified accounts. The daily update limit is further broken down into smaller limits for semi-hourly intervals.
  • Changes to account email: 4 per hour.
  • Following (daily): The technical follow limit is 400 per day. Please note that this is a technical account limit only, and there are additional rules prohibiting aggressive following behavior.
  • Following (account-based): Once an account is following 5,000 other accounts, additional follow attempts are limited by account-specific ratios.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] otter@lemmy.ca 56 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is enshitification, but it might be indirectly helping people who are on Twitter too much ๐Ÿ˜„

It doesn't do much to bot farms since they can keep spinning up more accounts

[โ€“] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 18 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I would argue you cannot enshitify a service that was already shit. At this point this is more of a conshitidation.

[โ€“] Zagorath@quokk.au 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Enshittification doesn't mean "making a good system bad". It's a specific process whereby the user experience of a platform is degraded in order to benefit the business partners. Then even the business partners are ripped off to benefit the platform owners.

[โ€“] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If you want to get picky, Xwitter didn't enshitify as laid out as a concept by Cory Doctorow. The best example is probably Amazon which went from being insanely user friendly to lock in users, to supplier-friendly and increasingly less so for users, until it had squeezed and shafted both groups. That's enshitification and it doesn't apply to Xwitter. They had problems to make money before a certain somebody bought it. They've been bleeding users since the eventually Nazi saluting manbaby bought it, who then wanted to sue advertisers who refused to buy ads on his service. There was no user lock-in and then a supplier lock-in. There was just shit. All their current problems are man made. By one specific man.

[โ€“] Darnton@piefed.zip 1 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

Just because it is caused by one man doesn't mean it isn't entshittification.

[โ€“] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 1 points 24 minutes ago

Yeah but it isn't here.

I never thought I'd like using a word more than enshittification, but conshitidation takes the cake, I think.