this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
104 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

84796 readers
3607 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1135683/x-announces-significant-restrictions-to-free-accounts-50-posts-and-200-replies-per-day

  • Direct Messages (daily): The limit is 500 messages sent per day.
  • Posts: 50 original posts and 200 replies per day for unverified accounts. The daily update limit is further broken down into smaller limits for semi-hourly intervals.
  • Changes to account email: 4 per hour.
  • Following (daily): The technical follow limit is 400 per day. Please note that this is a technical account limit only, and there are additional rules prohibiting aggressive following behavior.
  • Following (account-based): Once an account is following 5,000 other accounts, additional follow attempts are limited by account-specific ratios.
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago

If these restrictions are significant, please seek therapy

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Since 2007 or so, I haven't seen a good use case for Xitter other than situations where mass messaging is necessary. Like a utility company announcing maintenance or outages. Why do people care so much about what other people think?

My dear mother taught me that opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one and they all stink.

Wise woman.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

this saying doesnt apply universally, what about people into butt stuff that regularly bleach their assholes you tear into that after a good bleaching/shower (and enema, if you want to be safe), it's fine

[–] oyzmo@piefed.social 4 points 3 hours ago

Do real people use this? Though it was just bots and trolls...

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Does anyone actually reach those numbers? Is this a crackdown on bots?

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 52 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

50 posts a day!? If you hit 50 posts a day they should just ban you.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 6 points 3 hours ago

The point is to make bot farms create thousands of new accounts, driving up user accounts so they can trick investors and advertisers into thinking they still have a viable business.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"significant restrictions"

I wonder if author is a twitter addict

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

https://xcancel.com/htxtafrica

At least as far as sharing every article on their site there, yes. Almost 50k tweets

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

Eh that doesn't count. It's probably automated anyway.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 54 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is enshitification, but it might be indirectly helping people who are on Twitter too much 😄

It doesn't do much to bot farms since they can keep spinning up more accounts

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 18 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I would argue you cannot enshitify a service that was already shit. At this point this is more of a conshitidation.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Enshittification doesn't mean "making a good system bad". It's a specific process whereby the user experience of a platform is degraded in order to benefit the business partners. Then even the business partners are ripped off to benefit the platform owners.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 1 points 3 hours ago

If you want to get picky, Xwitter didn't enshitify as laid out as a concept by Cory Doctorow. The best example is probably Amazon which went from being insanely user friendly to lock in users, to supplier-friendly and increasingly less so for users, until it had squeezed and shafted both groups. That's enshitification and it doesn't apply to Xwitter. They had problems to make money before a certain somebody bought it. They've been bleeding users since the eventually Nazi saluting manbaby bought it, who then wanted to sue advertisers who refused to buy ads on his service. There was no user lock-in and then a supplier lock-in. There was just shit. All their current problems are man made. By one specific man.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago

I never thought I'd like using a word more than enshittification, but conshitidation takes the cake, I think.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 38 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Why the fuck do people still use Twitter? Why would you pay to use social media? You're already the product, and now you're going to pay to be the fucking product? Are you stupid?

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

hey now the gipity gonna save us all. It is the greatest invention ever. 🤤

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Have you met people lately?

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 8 points 7 hours ago

Yes I have. It was not good.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, man, this will affect tens of people.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 11 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Its so hard for me to believe that there are people out there for whom this will be an issue. Who are these people and what's wrong with them?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

My thoughts also... who the hell posts more than 50 times a day... well that's twitter isn't probably paid for with our tax dollars anyway.

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 1 points 4 hours ago

Pretty much anyone whose username ends in .eth or begins with a dollar sign or has a crypto address in their bio, but the vast majority of those people already pay for that blue checkmark anyway

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 7 hours ago

Twitter being paid for with our tax dollars is the first explanation I've heard which sounds like a way this company could actually continue to function.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 2 points 7 hours ago

Twits. It's a social class and a diagnosis.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 10 points 8 hours ago

Oh no! The nazi bar has set a drink limit! Guess I'll just have to continue not drinking there.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I'm happy to say that the only time I've ever even been on twitter was to check down times on destiny 2 servers which at the time was literally the only place they'd post stuff like that... Nobody knows why... But then again it's bungie... So...

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

omgawd sucker. I want it to speed up. Omgawd loser turds

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

Oh, no!

Anyway...

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

The upside of Twitter's downfall has been the absence of "look what so and so said in a tweet" headlines.

[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 8 points 9 hours ago

That means I'll end each day having only 50 posts remaining...

Even when I had an account years ago there was not a single day I posted/replied/commented/shared more than 1-3 times a day (1-3 interactions a day)

It was never my thing really so it was easy to remove from my life.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 hours ago

Who cares. Piece of shit platform.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

How could anyone limit themselves to 50 posts on apartheid-fan-boi.facist?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Let me get this straight.....

Elon musk buys twitter for 44 BILLION dollars with the expectation that it will help be influencial towards societies general conversation.

So then he starts turning twitter into a right wing cesspool, and some users start leaving. Granted, not nearly enough. I think I read about 30% of the site has left, but thats still far too many who haven't left.

So despite his stupidity, he still has a sizeable platform. And his thought process is......"hey, you know those influencial voices we have on society? Lets limit those!"

So now they are reducing the amount of messages their users can put out into the world.

..........so what is even the goal here? Are they just doing things to stay in the news?

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Stop trying to make sense of what he is doing. He is a common criminal fascist who is getting his nut just like sam gipity... Scammers don't need to make sense.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 2 points 6 hours ago

It's because he's an idiot.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'd like to know how many of that 70% left are dead accounts.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

......at least 1.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Gotta extract more value from the reduced user base. Think Netflix. Plus, they gotta recoup AI “investment” costs, and the remaining people on Xitter are predominantly mouth breathing rubes.

Add that to foresight only as far as the next quarter and it’s the most logical recipe for success /s

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

This is great! We need more enshittification on X!

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 3 points 8 hours ago

But the bots will be less effective. I bet the API charges are going up soon.