this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
363 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

85274 readers
4389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why can’t a company do smart glasses with self-hostable or fully local processing?

I’d love a pair but fuck streaming everything I see to a random dude in Nigeria

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well for one thing, it's creepy and the people around you don't want to be passively recorded 24/7.

Remember Google Glass? Its users were called "glassholes" for a reason.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sadly, Meta's glasses is less obvious, so that term is harder to use accurately.

[–] mech@feddit.org 6 points 23 hours ago

That's why smart glasses with a hidden camera need to be banned by law.
Or include punching people who film you as self defense, might be even more impactful.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

They're still glASSHOLES

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because recording people without their consent is creepy AF.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world -2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Of course it is. But if I do it locally it’s just me, not some megacorps wage slaves looking at the data.

Mostly my nerd brain would like to go “what is this plant” or “overlay all planes overhead to my screen” 😀

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 21 hours ago

There are to separate issues here:

  • corporation gathering surveillance data on everyone
  • creeps filming women and children

Even if it's just for you it's still creepy. You may not record people without consent but we don't know that. All we see is a camera pointed at us.

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Self-hosted doesn't mean "look how nice I am". When a piece of tech is shit, it's shit whether it is self-hosted or not.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not about being nice. It’s about me knowing where my data is.

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Are you a cybersecurity expert? Can you guarantee that the data you'll collect with your secret agent glasses won't end up in the open?

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yes.

Unless someone phyiscally breaks into my house and steals my server. Which would require a very targeted attack which again is WAAY out of scope in my (and everyone else’s) threat model

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

You're a smart guy.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The G2 augmented reality glasses fit that. No camera or microphone.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

But I want a camera and a microphone.

I just want to use my own hardware to analyse whatever they’re recording.