this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
560 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

85274 readers
4389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 318 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

laughs in Firefox/Librewolf

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

FF support is getting worse and worse though.

Barely any of the sites I use for work support FF.

Laugh all you want but shit is a bit fucked.

Ladybird is our last best hope and its barely a glimmer.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

Fun fact: many sites that say that they don't support firefox lie, their sites usually support it but they never tested it or they deem firefox "less secure" or some bullshit, but with an useragent spoofer, they will work

(Not all sites ofc)

[–] fizzle@quokk.au -1 points 24 minutes ago

Fun fact: you don't seem very bright.

By "support FF" I mean "can be used in firefox or a derivative with comparable features to chrome".

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 50 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

No worries, play store-recaptcha is coming for you too!

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Waiting for another player....

PRESS START TO JOIN

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 54 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

affects mobile the most obviously... but google's playbook is to basically have forced telemetry always and enforce integrity of their telemetry, and by extension advertising etc.

https://piunikaweb.com/2026/05/07/google-recaptcha-play-services-requirement/ - this just seems like an ok article for it, I did a simple web search and it came up, but others certainly exist if you dislike the source.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Looking forward to when they remove the old options & force PC users to scan reCAPTCHA QRs:

“Scan to verify you’re human” screenshot

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 26 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Those sites will be dead to me :)

QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

On my phone I use URLCheck (available in f-droid). You set it as your default browser app, but instead of opening a browser, it opens a popup where you can see the URL, and use some useful tools like removing tracking parameters or automatically rewriting x.com to xcancel.com. The rewritten URL can then just be forwarded to your actual browser (or whatever app is set up to handle that particular URL).

I still won't actually open random qr code URLs though, especially not ones from google.

[–] GMac@feddit.org 1 points 50 minutes ago

Thats new. Thank you for the tip. Installed!

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

...just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

Unfortunately, we're fighting an uphill battle here.

We'd need government regulation "protecting privacy", instead they seem all too eager to concede that in a futile effort to " protect the children ".

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

I doubt SearXNG is going to integrate it lmao, and if they do, someone will fork or i will keep using older versions

[–] NakedNateRollerSkate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Seldon@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

For people who want an opinionated browser... Yes. They have sponsored shortcuts which cannot be disabled and they ghost out the option to in the settings. If you want to dig around the about:config and tweak things, fine, but I'd rather use a browser I can make my own. Librewolf is excellently bare bones.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 52 minutes ago

Sponsored shortcuts? They don't have them, i did a clean install only some week ago so i doubt it's a new thing

I haven't seen any of those things yet, but I'll try to keep an eye out. The only one I noticed was a default search engine to Google, but DDG was an easy enough option. I like libre wolf as well, but I'm not a fan of the updating scheme on my system.

[–] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 hours ago

Corpo banned it for compatibility with crap code apparently