this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
364 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85274 readers
4389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 hour ago

Remember that article awhile back about the FBI recommending you use an adblocker?

That means even the FBI recommends you don't use Google and Microsoft browsers anymore

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 minutes ago (1 children)

Cue the Brave shills “recommending” to switch to Brave in 5..4..3..

[–] darkwing_duck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 minutes ago (2 children)

Wait what's wrong with Brave?

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 minutes ago

I would argue that if you're choosing between chrome and brave, brave is still better.

[–] aport@programming.dev 1 points 4 minutes ago

It's not firefox

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Man, I panicked at first because I have to use Edge at work. But this article clickbaited me, as uBlock origin lite is good enough for most people.

Still, screw Chrome, Edge, and Opera for being such dicks. It's always those three being the bottom tier browsers...

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I think the other browser in your list have little choice, since they use the chrome rendering engine. Only Firefox still has it's own engine.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 42 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Government becomes more fascist, tech companies become more fascist.

People don’t like surveillance advertising, and most reject it when given the choice. Unpopular policies are squashed when the people are represented, and the Republican policies and interests of forced and extreme deregulation are being represented here, not the people’s.

That, and I believe advertising is inherently fascistic in the way that it distorts realty, and intrusively attempts to modify thinking with punitive, insulting, and psychologically coercive methods - it is corporate propaganda, and when it is combined with surveillance and purchased by the State, it becomes fascism.

I can’t wait for them to try and make ad-blocking illegal. We’re seeing a similar trend with the age verification firm Yoti “reporting” GrapheneOS users to “the authorities”, whatever the hell that Gestapo bullshit scare-tactic means. If FOSS software and ad-blocking are tools of privacy and freedom from thought manipulation, and those concepts are being attacked by a State-backed corporate entity, then the State no longer represents those values. Chrome, like so much other corporate software that has sunk to surveillance advertising with a healthy side of selling data to the government, is now just another fascist tool to punish democratic resistance.

Freedom from advertising is a human right.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...

~Edward Bernays From his 1928 publication - Propaganda

Edward is the father of modern advertising through psychological manipulation.

He's the reason bacon and eggs are breakfast.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I am posting this again in such a short time, but The Century of Self is required viewing in my opinion. That asshole you mentioned, Bernays, is one of the prime perpetrators for the state of advertising.

— Anyway, I do highly recommend (for those that haven't) investing the time and watching The Century of the Self by Adam Curtis. It is very illuminating as to how we've arrived where we are now with regards to propaganda and advertising which are rooted in the same psychological underpinnings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Century_of_the_Self

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJ3RzGoQC4s

It appears to be on Netflix, as well.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

I was the one who you posted it to and it's well worth a watch. I put it at 1.25 speed and that was about right.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Hey there, Pele!

I was going to mention two other docs to you that my friend and I found quite good (though different topics). They are:

Workingman's Death

Why we Fight

I hope you can find them somewhere. If you torrent or what not, they are doubtlessly found there.

Ludites unite, might be time to go back to the old ways.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 232 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

laughs in Firefox/Librewolf

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 32 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

No worries, play store-recaptcha is coming for you too!

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Waiting for another player....

PRESS START TO JOIN

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 39 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

affects mobile the most obviously... but google's playbook is to basically have forced telemetry always and enforce integrity of their telemetry, and by extension advertising etc.

https://piunikaweb.com/2026/05/07/google-recaptcha-play-services-requirement/ - this just seems like an ok article for it, I did a simple web search and it came up, but others certainly exist if you dislike the source.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 minutes ago

Looking forward to when they remove the old options & force PC users to scan reCAPTCHA QRs:

“Scan to verify you’re human” screenshot

[–] NakedNateRollerSkate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Seldon@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

For people who want an opinionated browser... Yes. They have sponsored shortcuts which cannot be disabled and they ghost out the option to in the settings. If you want to dig around the about:config and tweak things, fine, but I'd rather use a browser I can make my own. Librewolf is excellently bare bones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 hours ago

Corpo banned it for compatibility with crap code apparently

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 179 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Pretty fucked up considering how much malware and scammy bullshit come though ads.

Seriously. If Google really wants to shove ads down our throats, they could at least regulate them so they're not constantly horny scams. But that would cost them money, oh the humanity.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Over 10 years ago someone at my office had their work PC and user drive encrypted with ransomware because of a bad ad injection from one of those job search sites. Thankfully it was limited to nothing critical and incremental backups restore the drive...but hopefully they found a good lead because they were canned.

If they'd had a good ad blocker this would have been a non issue

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 2 points 41 minutes ago

I work in IT: Pretty much all the malware we deal with comes from ads. I've pitched making ad blocking standard but they never go for it, even though it's clear it would prevent an absolute shit ton of attacks. It's crazy!

[–] henfredemars@lemdro.id 118 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Yep, sorry but not sorry. Advertisements aren’t safe. The industry has been ruined by bad actors and it’s a shame, but also not my problem.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 75 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

I worked in ads only a few months and learned how fucked that industry was. They're basically given license to just run scripts in your browser, sucking as much info as they can. The fact that it hasn't been regulated to hell is shocking, and truly a failure of all leaders.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 45 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser

That's the crazy thing.

You want to show me an image, maybe an animated gif, and link it to your website where you're selling shit? Fine. Annoying, but fine.

But I don't care how many crocodile tears they shed about 'but websites depend on ad income' -- I am not letting random, unvetted advertisers run arbitrary code on my computer. I don't care if it's in a sandbox inside a sandbox. Exploits may be found, sandboxes may be escaped. And there's plenty of trouble they can get into even within their little sandbox, like running a fucking crypto miner or something.

So, yeah. Adblock and noscript everywhere and always.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 minutes ago

Yes, they can host a GIF on their server & show it to me with a non-personalized link, & promote it where they believe the average reader might be interested in it. Or some reader(s).

Just show me the ads you’re showing everybody else, and make money from sales of useful things & services.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 hours ago

Honestly, not that shocking.

It's because people don't go into these offices with fire and guns. If a bunch of advertising people were slaughtered every few weeks things may get better.

Same goes for collections, eventually no one will want to do the job.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Internet Browsers store way too much data and have waaaay too many permissions. It's sickening.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

More freedom coming straight from The Land Of THe Free©.

[–] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 60 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The more you tighten your grip, Google, the more ad revenue will slip through your fingers.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 40 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They could have sat on 30 second ads every 15 minutes till the cows came home and most of us would have been fine with it.

They could have sat on premium family for $9 a month for years and we'd have been ok with it.

They had to be greedy as fuck until none of us want to use their services.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 23 points 3 hours ago

The line has to go up. That is literally the law. The fact that Youtube has a larger income than Disney doesn't mean it will stop. They can never stop. They just can crash and burn down eventually but only after making a few people very very rich.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Not after they demonstrate the power of their evil browser. In a way, you have determined the choice of the ads that you will be shown first.

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 24 points 4 hours ago

Good thing I don't use any of those shitty browsers.

load more comments
view more: next ›