560
Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow
(www.neowin.net)
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
560 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
85274 readers
4389 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Cue the Brave shills “recommending” to switch to Brave in 5..4..3..
Wait what's wrong with Brave?
Brave is by a company who’s in the business of serving ads.
Much like google was back in the day, they’re trying to obtain market share with a product that they can easily manipulate after the fact and rely on people not jumping ship as things get progressively worse and worse bit by bit
Think of the “approved ads” era followed by the “enhanced security features” which made it so your block list couldn’t be updated at a moments notice and now it’s being stripped entirely.
Better to avoid it entirely and just use Firefox or a derivative thereof
It's not firefox
Firefox doesn't have tab groups on mobile
"Firefox doesn't have this one feature I like so I will keep using browser made by an ad company. I'm sure there will be no consequences long term".
"Oh shit. No one could have predicted this!".
You may have a browsing addiction if you need tab groups on mobile, wow...
I swear I hate tabbed browsing, because it leads to people hording tabs like a freaking squirrel hordes nuts.
If you need it for later, book mark it.
If you're done with it close it.
Added to nightly somewhat recently.
It is also chromium based, so stands to get the same nerf.
Nope, Shields are built into the browser itself, not as an extension which uses those APIs. [1]
[1] https://brave.com/blog/brave-shields-manifest-v3/
Yeap, just a matter of time.
I would argue that if you're choosing between chrome and brave, brave is still better.
So Brave is a good answer to an absolutely terrible question?
Brave has a certain distasteful reputation earned by repeated unethical fuckery. If you are fine with what brave does, you have no reason to avoid chrome in the first place.
Sure. Probably. But why are we choosing between Chrome and Brave?
On iOS you can go on pornhub on brave and it blocks all the ads and cookie popups.
That's one reason that uh... "someone" might use brave.
People entirely blind to the idea that they can just choose something else instead of 2 piles of shit, one of which has a cherry on top and was sprayed with perfume recently.
Its like some sort of awful american tradition at this point.
Because Firefox is a different engine and might not work well with certain websites.
I've only ever encountered one website where Firefox didnt work.
and that was because the website was coded maliciously to reject firefox.. a plugin to make it think firefox was chrome and suddenly it ran fine.
Well I did, the Amazon Prime Video has many weird behaviors on Firefox compared to the Chromium engine, even YouTube used to have before.
Any web developer knows it isn’t as simple as “code once, work everywhere”. If companies don’t test on Firefox (which is a reality nowadays given its small market share) bugs happen in very weird and unusual ways.
Only issue I've ever had with Amazon Video was the fact they artificially limit resolution to 320p for people on linux, regardless of browser.
Couldn’t use just set the user agent?
For a lot of people, it's an easy transition.
DDG, Vivaldi, etc. harder transitions.
Firefox for my parents would result in calls every 3 days for sites that aren't working right.
I'm just saying perfect is the enemy of good.
Very difficult to believe. I have had issues with Firefox over the years but in every sing[e instance it was a resu[t of my custom setup. The browser has no major compatibility issues out of the box. I think it's way more likely your parents are technologically illiterate and confuse other problems or gaps in their knowledge as issues with the "new" thing (in this case, the browser).
Sorry, what? If they are so tech-illiterate that they have to call you and ask why the website is not working, then what kind of web sites are they visiting?
Been using FF since 2022 and the only sites that wont work are the ones that utilizes HID. Are your parents trying to flash custom firmware for their phones though browser every third day?
Good for you. I've been in tech for over 16 years and FF absolutely does not work well on ~25% of websites.
Been in tech longer then that (if for some reason we are doing that now) and I will officially call bullshit on that claim.
Cool. I still champion FF every chance I get, but the experience is not seamless.
I'm glad your experience has been smooth.
Waterfox is just a fork of FF. We are pushing the same browser, more or less.
I love Waterfox!
Wait, really? The access cripplers are crazily powerful add-ons for the paranoid, like NoScript, not the browser itself. Like what example websites, specifically?
Bare MVP is ublock+ stock FF. Even allowing 3rd party cookies and...
Y'all can burn me at the stake all you want, I don't fucking care. I use FF daily and champion it, but to say it works 100% all the time for every site is just disingenuous.
Just wanna say I've had similar experiences. I don't think I'd put the number as high as 25% for myself, but my workplace's internal sites and some local/utility sites are also broken on non-Chromium browsers.
Wanna link those websites so we can see?
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/26486446
Do your own research, I am not your slave.
The person who makes the claims is the one who gives evidence.
I get it that tech people stumble upon these sites much more often than non-techies. My point was that if your parents are having website issues every other day (which implies they are not tech-savvy), then why would they even visit sites that are not FF-compatible. How many sites out of all the web do you think are not compatible with FF? Give an example of a normie site that wont work well with FF.
On the other hand, if your parents are tech-savvy then why would they ask you why a website wont load properly? Do you get it that your statement counters itself?
I have not been able to get proper payment processing to work with Portland area PGE in FF, ever. Across Windows, Linux, or Android (can't speak for MacOS or iOS).
Sir, 2000s called and asked you to return this argument back.
What sites are those?
Websites that are actively malicious against firefox, that miraculously work when you have a useragent plugin that makes firefox report that its chrome proving that the site works fine, if the asshole code is removed?
I think this is when @AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com will discreetly not answer or otherwise avoid mentioning the exact websites... (Because there are none)
Yup mostly because I don't care anymore. You're all stating the, "it works on my machine" mantra and I don't care. See my other comments for some examples.
It's true, unfortunately. Not every 3 days, but once a month I encount these sites.
Change the icon on the desktop to the chrome pinwheel and they’ll never know the difference.
Nothing.