this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
248 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

72406 readers
2554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, it's fun that they mention F-Droid, because the maintainers are bullies who bully their contributors and generally act very unpleasant. They like to make new rules on the spot.

I abandoned using the project altogether, not someone I want to support.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That apps published there can't be wrappers around a web application.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good rule, those should be web addresses, not apps. Or even better, native applications rather than web apps, but it does depend on the context.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Eh... why? More to the point, it's not mentioned anywhere in their guidelines, it was made up on the spot by the fella doing the code review.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are inefficient and bloated.

And personally, I prefer good reasoning over good rules. If something comes up that is a bad idea but there's no existing rule against it, the rules should be changed to address it. As long as the reasoning is sound, I think it's a good thing, especially when we're talking about something like a software distribution platform as opposed to say laws that determine freedom or imprisonment.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Also if you've made a web app, let it be installed as a web app. Both FF and Chrome let you install web apps in one click.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world -2 points 1 year ago

Inefficient and bloated describes 90% of all apps I've ever seen, regardless of technology used, so I fail to see your point.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you really want to have it available on F-Droid, you can always put it in a separate repository. So I can see it being annoying that they reject it from their repo, but there's still a reasonable path forward.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well, I have the app on Google Play store, which was originally meant to be the alternative, now it's the main store.

[–] testEmailVerified@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's a wrapper in this context?

An app that's just WebView?

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not WebView, but a so-called TWA, aka Trusted Web Activity, a features specifically designed to wrap PWAs and give them full-blown app capabilities.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago

What additional capabilities does that give the app beyond using Firefox or Chrome to install it as a PWA?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Seems to me like they've done a pretty good job keeping their store free of malicious apps, I've never heard of any breaches like I have of every other store including Snap and Flatpak.

Maybe they're pissing some people off in the process, but maybe it's the right people to piss off. They've been able to hold it together in the FOSS app space better than most.