Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

339

AI will reduce workforce, say 41% of execs in a survey (www.theregister.com)

submitted 7 months ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

222 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

If they could replace project managers that would be nice. In theory it is an important job, but in practice it's just done by someone's mate who was most productive when they don't actually turn up.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Paranoia RPG has a very realistic way of determining who gets to be the leader of a group. First, you pick who'll do what kind of job (electronics, brute force, etc). Whoever didn't get picked becomes the leader, as that person is too dumb to do anything useful.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes that's quite a funny and satirical way of doing it but it's probably not actually the best way in real life.

I think Boeing have proven this quite nicely for everyone, the company was much better off when they had actual engineers in charge. When they got corporate paper pushes everything went downhill.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I have been on enough projects where engineers were in charge that went to hell to know that isnt always a solution. And yes I am an engineer.

One of the projects I am on now the main lead is full PE civil and its a manmade clusterfuck well behind schedule, overbudget, and several corporate bridges burned. Haven't even started digging yet.

By far the very biggest cluster fuck I was ever on was run by a Chemical Engineer. A 40 million dollar disaster that never should have been even considered.

Being good at technical problems (which frankly most of us aren't) doesn't mean you know how to do anything else.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I have had good ones and not so good ones.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I swear people don't know the difference between a good project manager and a bad one, or no one.

Everyone on here is on about how the.board has no idea what the bottom rungs of the ladder do and are all "haha they are so stupid they think we do nothing". Then in the next sentence say they don't know what the board does and that they just do nothing.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Project managers on board members what the hell you want about

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

People slagging off jobs they don't understand.

Both project managers that they probably have experience with dealing with but don't understand and board members they probably don't have any experience with and also don't understand.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Board members don't do shit

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I see.

What is this judgment based on?

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

First hand experience