this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
171 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3196 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Or how about you legislate for parental controls on Smartphones.

You know, like how any desktop or laptop has them?

How are you going to enforce this law? Because parents will still buy their kids smartphones. Are you going to have the police arresting under 16s and confiscating their phones?

[–] adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Apple has pretty robust parental controls on their devices.

Source: am technical enough to have set them up.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 18 points 7 months ago

So does Android.

It's just a moral panic, as usual.

Politicians love moral panic.

I like parents having the option, but I think the better option is to build actual trust with kids, not lock down their stuff and spy on them. Kids will find workarounds, so technical measures are merely a tool that should be used with restraint.

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 months ago

Some laws have little to no thought put into. This is one of them. Not only is this unnecessary but it would create more technological waste.