this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
373 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The aircraft flew up to speeds of 1,200mph. DARPA did not reveal which aircraft won the dogfight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

How do you deploy manned fighters against an aircraft you can't detect?

Edit: As to not downing the aircraft. That's irrelevant. It wouldn't matter if it's an air to air missile or ground to air...you just fire more.

I can buy thousands of rockets for the cost of a single F22 or F16.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

How do you deploy manned fighters against an aircraft you can’t detect?

Detect and target aren't the same thing. There's various Air Defense platforms that can detect stealth air craft but they lack the resolution necessary to target them. For targetting the launch platform has to be a lot closer.

I can buy thousands of rockets for the cost of a single F22 or F16.

Annnd were back to the Air Defense platforms being hideously expensive. Literally no one can afford enough of them to cover more than a tiny fraction of their air space.

Forget "thousands" of missiles any country larger than a Lichtenstein would to need to buy millions of them along with enough Ground Detection and Launch Stations to cover their entire border. Utterly and totally unaffordable.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 7 months ago

Hurrah Liechtenstein, safest country on planet!

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You understand you need all that equipment to get a manned fighter close enough to engage. At that point firing a barrage of smart missiles is still cheaper.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And what equipment would that be?

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

The big cost would be satellite and radar coverage. We have that already.