this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
308 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3403 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cosmic_cowboy@reddthat.com 172 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Horrifying privacy implications aside, AI has really become the new cryptocurrency.

Don't get me wrong, both technologies are interesting, but it's tiring to see both be forced into applications that functioned just fine without them.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 60 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It's arguably worse, since it seems to be more pervasive than crypto and NFTs were at their peak.

Crypto never really hit the mainstream, and even NFTs were still fringe. Whereas AI and AI accelerators are packed into basically every new phone and (Intel) processor.

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Regulatory hurdles kept crypto out of most mainstream products. There are no such barriers for AI, and any that are put up may come too late.

There are also more possible mainstream use cases for AI - if the technology works as promised. That’s the biggest for AI currently, and some products like the Humane Pin are already tripping over it.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are way more uses cases to the average person than crypto so that's only natural. There's also a trust issue with crypto that doesn't exist with AI, as well as losing your money when things go wrong.

That being said, I don't approve of this nor adding it randomly to products where it clearly has little use. If people want generative software, they can just choose to install it.

[–] aphlamingphoenix@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's a trust issue here as well since AI only works if you train it and we are training it with our activity, reported to private companies who can do whatever they please with it. I don't trust anything Microsoft does.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I meant more a trust issue in the sense that it's hard for people to feel safe putting their money into crypto. A lot of the coins are scammy and even some of the exchanges don't really look legit.

In terms of privacy and collecting data which is what I feel like you are referring too, the general population sadly just doesn't give a shit. Most really don't care about what's being done with their data.

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why call out Intel? Pretty sure AMD and Nvidia are both putting dedicated AI hardware in all of their new and upcoming product lines. From what I understand they are even generally doing it better than Intel. Hell, Qualcomm is advertising their AI performance on their new chips and so is Apple. I don't think there is anyone in the chip world that isn't hopping on the AI train

[–] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because I was only aware of Intel (and Apple) doing it on computers, whereas most major flagship mobile devices have those accelerators now.

GPUs were excluded, since they're not as universal as processors are. A dedicated video card is still by and large considered an enthusiast part.

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Fair enough. Was just asking because the choice of company surprised me. AMD is putting "AI Engines in their new CPUs (separate silicon design from their GPUs) and while Nvidia largely only sells GPUs that are less universal, they've had dedicated AI hardware (tensor cores) in their offerings for the past three generations. If anything, Intel is barely keeping up with its competition in this area (for the record, I see vanishingly little value in the focus on AI as a consumer, so this isn't really a ding on Intel in my books, more so making the observation from a market forces perspective)

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago (3 children)

But what about my Web 3.0 AI cryptocurrency in the metaverse?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"An app that lets you make nfts from images created by a camera in the metaverse"

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t that already a thing? That surely has to be a thing already.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Probably already got rugpulled.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 12 points 6 months ago

Written in rust.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago